- Joined
- Nov 14, 2024
- Messages
- 772
- Reaction score
- 2,248
We're rolling out a new feature to our Guardian members to help them understand the sources shared on Websleuths: the Source Credibility Checker.
When you hover over a link posted in a thread, Guardians will now see additional information about that source - including its factual reporting history and overall credibility rating. Think of it as a quick reference card for the news sources you encounter every day.
Credibility Rating - An overall assessment of the source
When you hover over a link posted in a thread, Guardians will now see additional information about that source - including its factual reporting history and overall credibility rating. Think of it as a quick reference card for the news sources you encounter every day.
What You'll See
For supported sources, you'll see three ratings:Credibility Rating - An overall assessment of the source
- Low - Approach with significant caution
- Medium - Generally acceptable but verify important claims
- High - Well-established, reliable source
- Left - Promotes left-leaning stories, but rarely provides opposing viewpoints.
- Left-Center - Favors left-leaning framing, but makes an effort to balance perspectives.
- Least Biased / Pro-Science - Straight news stories equally represent all perspectives without discernible bias.
- Right-Center - Favors right-leaning framing, but makes an effort to balance perspectives.
- Right - Promotes right-leaning stories, but rarely provides opposing viewpoints.
- Questionable - Displays extreme bias, propaganda, unreliable sourcing, or a lack of transparency.
- Conspiracy-Pseudoscience - Disseminates unverified information related to known conspiracies or pseudoscientific claims.
- Satire - Uses humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of political and other topical issues.
- Very Low / Low - Significant history of failed fact-checks or poor sourcing
- Mixed - Inconsistent accuracy; some reliable reporting, some not
- Mostly Factual - Generally accurate with occasional errors
- High - Strong track record of accurate, well-sourced reporting
How the Ratings Work
Factual Reporting is calculated from four weighted factors:- Failed fact-checks (40%) - Has this source published debunked claims?
- Sourcing (25%) - Does this source cite its information properly?
- Transparency (25%) - Is ownership, funding, and editorial process clear?
- One-sidedness/Omission (10%) - Does this source leave out key facts?
- Economic System (35%) - the economic ideology the source promotes, from communism to no-regulation capitalism.
- Social Progressive Liberalism vs. Traditional Social Conservatism (35%) - the source’s stance on social values and advocacy.
- Straight News Reporting Balance (15%) - how well a source reports all sides in its straight news stories.
- Editorial Bias (15%) - he use of loaded emotional language that favors one side of the ideological spectrum, and bias expressed through opinion pieces and editorials.