New Searches based ON CASEY Sightings. JB advises Casey to reveal nothing

[pizmex]

I wasn't asking anyone to accept this. If Casey killed her child, she should hopefully be punished in accordance with whatever criminal laws apply.

But for now, she's maintaining her innocence, and she wouldn't be the first person to ever do so. And we should all be grateful to live in a Country where the Government has to prove its' case entirely.

Innocent?? This is about more then just that, she and her family are maintaining that Caylee is alive and out there, I think what blows everyone away is that if she is going to maintain her innocence would'nt she have ANY pretext of looking for her?? showing ANY concern for Caylee instead of herself!! :furious:

It's still not hard to understand. Once Casey establishes that she's maintaining her innocence, she has to go all the way. She's not very well going to maintain her innocence while simultaneously acknowledging that Caylee's dead.

Whether or not Casey's story, as supported by her family wherever possible, is believable is an entirely different issue. But that Casey hasn't confessed to anything is not the kind of shocking bombshelling oh my god news that everyone's making it out to be. So she wants a trial. Big deal. She isn't the first.

 

[PaperDoll]

Ok, I think I'm finally caught up -- 'til I go to post this! Anyone think it's a good idea to start a thread to discuss the car/TonE picking up KC, etc.? I'm been obsessed about this a long time and it appears that others are too.

ETA: I would do it myself, but I'm skeered!

Funny, I keep thinking of starting a thread myself, but like you, I'm skeered.. hehe I'm afraid what I want to say has already been said, a million times over.. :crazy:

 

[SeriouslySearching]

He knows what it means when they name her as THE suspect. The writing is very clear on the wall of denial and lies of his client. This is what I believe happened that he is reacting to because for them to name her means an arrest is now imminent.

 

[pizmex]

I heard that and was shocked!
What the heck is LE going to do now?
That is a sorta GUILTY but not saying GUILTY statement?

There's not a thing in the world LE is gonna be able to do with that statement. It'll never come into a Courtroom. It's a big non-issue. Much ado here about nothing.

By the way, Baez's statement is dead on, as far as sentiment. Contrary to what a person would believe just from reading these threads, --- Baez's job is to minimize, not maximize Casey's potential punishment. He's not supposed to conspire in cahoots with LE in order to sink Casey. Baez and LE have an adversarial relationship; their interests are not always mutual.

Of course, though, he never should have said what he said publicly, simply on grounds of taste. Certain things in life, even though entirely true and understandable, are better left unsaid. Baez might be wrong for saying what he said, but he's 100% correct for at least thinking what he said.

 

[indicat]

Not by JB but by some other party. All this is just too nuts to lie, say something....then not say anything... and then for JB to make a statement like that...

Very crazy to say the least and I truely feel that we haven't seen or heard the craziest yet.

And I also feel that when all is said and done....many will be shocked yet again.

just a feeling....way strange events going on here.

No, I disagree... I think she would love for everyone to believe that, but its not true. IMO

 

[sweetmop]

Is it just me or do you find it odd that JB hasn't come out today with a spin on what he said yesterday? I fully expected him to be calling the press and screaming "Foul!" or something. "Out of context!" "One-sided Journalism" "That is NOT what I said!"

I felt the same way, SS. I figured Jose would be on all the morning news shows, telling all of us how his words were misconstrued! I'm really surprised we haven't seen or heard from him today. Yes, it's very odd!
I still feel that whenever he's approached on yesterday's statements, his words, he will say that is not what he meant! And Casey is being falsely accused by the big bad LE.:behindbar

 

[mahmoo]

Just my opinion but.........I'm thinkin KC is gonna need a team of lawyers to get her off this potential murder charge that looks likely. I don't think Jose' is gonna be able to handle what's comin his way.

 

[Marina2]

Funny, I keep thinking of starting a thread myself, but like you, I'm skeered.. hehe I'm afraid what I want to say has already been said, a million times over.. :crazy:

PaperDoll, if I had 17,000+ posts to my credit nothing on this board would scare me!!

:bowdown:

 

[mahmoo]

Funny, I keep thinking of starting a thread myself, but like you, I'm skeered.. hehe I'm afraid what I want to say has already been said, a million times over.. :crazy:

Heck......start one......if it's not appropriate or no one responds.....they'll just remove it........and that's okay too.

 

[indicat]

It's still not hard to understand. Once Casey establishes that she's maintaining her innocence, she has to go all the way. She's not very well going to maintain her innocence while simultaneously acknowledging that Caylee's dead.

Whether or not Casey's story, as supported by her family wherever possible, is believable is an entirely different issue. But that Casey hasn't confessed to anything is not the kind of shocking bombshelling oh my god news that everyone's making it out to be. So she wants a trial. Big deal. She isn't the first.

yes, I see your point.

 

[Blink34]

SS, I really believe he meant to say this. I think (as others have said) he is sending out feelers to see if he can get some type of plea for KC.

Imo, some type of info has been revealed to him this week and they are running scared.

Marina,I cmpletely agree. I think JB is clear what the suspect classification means to his Client in the next week, but I think the plea ship sailed early on.
I think he gambled on some things his Client told him, the first of which is the ID of Caylee's father. I think that information will seal her fate.
I watched the CA interview with Det. Evers and Det. Melich. I am convinced CA knew exactly who this child's father was, and was specifically trying to mislead LE.

You DO NOT file paperwork establishing custody in the event of Casey's death as grandparents without notification to the Father, it is illegal, there is a burden of notification on behalf of the petitioner. Unless of course, they had a cert of death. In which case, they knew exactly who he was.

Either way, they knew, and either way, they lied at some point.
What is the reason?

 

[Seranade]

A couple of questions for our legal beagles please...

If a GJ is convened, is it secret or a matter of public record? Or, is there an option to do it either way? Also, how long would it typically take from the time the GJ is convened until a decision is made? And then, how long from the indigtment to an arrest? Is it immediate? If anyone can help, I'd appreciate it!

The proceedings themselves are secret and any officer of the court or grand jury personnel are not allowed to discuss any part of it.(Rule 6(e) ) However, the witnesses themselves are free to discuss the testimony they have given unless expressly forbidden to do so. IMO, the fact of a GJ being convened in this case would be very difficult to keep secret, what with witnesses trooping in and out of the Court house.

If a GJ is convened and an indictment is handed down an arrest is usully immediate, especially in a high profile case such as this one.

 

[SeriouslySearching]

There's not a thing in the world LE is gonna be able to do with that statement. It'll never come into a Courtroom. It's a big non-issue. Much ado here about nothing.

By the way, Baez's statement is dead on, as far as sentiment. Contrary to what a person would believe just from reading these threads, --- Baez's job is to minimize, not maximize Casey's potential punishment. He's not supposed to conspire in cahoots with LE in order to sink Casey. Baez and LE have an adversarial relationship; their interests are not always mutual.

Of course, though, he never should have said what he said publicly, simply on grounds of taste. Certain things in life, even though entirely true and understandable, are better left unsaid. Baez might be wrong for saying what he said, but he's 100% correct for at least thinking what he said.

Yeah, right. Much ado about nothing. LOL Yes, it is every day that a defense attorney spouts something like this off to the national press in a high profile case.

 

[monoxide]

I wish I could be George or Cindy for a day

 

[alwaysonmymind]

Yeah, right. Much ado about nothing. LOL Yes, it is every day that a defense attorney spouts something like this off to the national press in a high profile case.

Agreed. I believe it speaks to his lack of experience in dealing with the media.

 

[SeriouslySearching]

I wish I could be George or Cindy for a day

Bite your tongue! I would never wish that in a million years!

 

[SeriouslySearching]

Agreed. I believe it speaks to his lack of experience in dealing with the media.

But that is the thing...while he does lack the experience...he isn't stupid. Something else is going on here which is the reason he did not backpedal today.

 

[pizmex]

Yeah, right. Much ado about nothing. LOL Yes, it is every day that a defense attorney spouts something like this off to the national press in a high profile case.

And the practical effect of all of this will be ... nothing!

And it isn't a big deal. It's the truth. Maybe an uncomfortable truth, but a truth nevertheless. Baez isn't supposed to help the State to convict his own client. It's the State's burden and all that jazz. This is really, really, basic stuff. Perhaps Nancy Grace will milk that statement if she hasn't already. No one really takes her seriously though.

 

[monoxide]

Bite your tongue! I would never wish that in a million years!

I wish it because I would handle business and end everything. I'd make her speak. She'd either speak or be sitting in jail. She'd speak or she'd end up black and blue. Everything would be over and George and Cindy would have a clear name thanks to my actions while using their worthless bodies

 

[SeriouslySearching]

I understand it does nothing to change the case or the legal parts of the case (save a possible point for appeal later for ineffective counsel). However, he did reveal his client would be helping to incriminate herself if she did give up Caylee's whereabouts. True?