Jayelles
New Member
Maikai said:Whay are your credentials in determining they're not stun gun marks?
Doberson explained that statement....at the time he didn't have a specific stun gun to use in experiments. When Lou Smit gave him ALL of the info, he pursued the research.
One does not need credentials to question the validity of a diagnosis made upon photographic evidence only. Lou Smit did not give Doberson all of the info. The most vital piece of "info" (i.e. JonBenet's body) was missing.
Robert Stratbucker has extensive experience of stunguns and he says that the marks were not made by a stungun. Taser inc, who make the stunguns say they have never been able to replicate the marks that are on JonBenet.
IMO, Doberson's experiment was not exhaustive. Most importantly, the pig didn't die. They should have experimented on a pig that was to be slaughtered to see how the marks altered after death.
I have experimented with the phtographs myself and whereas the marks on the pig aligned perfectly with the stungun prods, the marks on jonBenet did not. The graphics which are posted at jamesons have also been "tweaked" to make them look as though they match. I have proved this. In reality, the marks on JonBenet were closer together than the marks on the pig. Whomever posted the graphic at jameson's enlarged it so that it aligned perfectly with the marks on the pig. An honest error I'm sure.