Especially since they're all women and if they're going off mitochondrial DNA, that's probably the case.I think if it's a DNA ruleout on any one of the three who are related, that automatically rules out the other two?
Especially since they're all women and if they're going off mitochondrial DNA, that's probably the case.I think if it's a DNA ruleout on any one of the three who are related, that automatically rules out the other two?
I think if it's a DNA ruleout on any one of the three who are related, that automatically rules out the other two?
The Barrels.
Why barrels? Obviously to conceal them. Particularly during transporting them. This also implies that a truck was involved, as I doubt a 55 gallon drum would fit in a car trunk.
But, short of incinerating, or sinking them to the bottom of the ocean - burial is the next best choice. But they didn't bury them. Could it be because they were killed in the winter, and the ground was too frozen?
Also - barrels were probably easier to get back then. They are well regulated now. But they would have been worth something... Could they have been reported stolen? If not because of their own value, but because someone broke in someplace to get them?
The barrels and the actual crime:
The person either had the barrels before or after these people were killed. If he had them before, it implies that either this crime was pre mediated, by virtue of the fact he had them already - or he had ready access to them, after he killed them, in cold blood, and knew he could get them.
If he didn't have them - I think this means they were killed inside a private residence. Where they would go unnoticed while he went and found the barrels.
I'm not sure how many premeditated murders are committed by bashing people's heads in, but I'm guessing not a big percentage.
Also, putting them in barrels that can be rolled could make transporting them, and rolling them into the woods, a one man job. But it couldn't have been easy.
Also, if the barrels were filled with whatever material they were designed to hold like solvent, oil, grease, fertilizer that would make them even more valuable, and more likely to be reported stolen.
Is it possible to determine what these barrels were used for? That could help narrow down where they were taken from, and perhaps provide new clues.
Lastly, do we know if there was any clothing found with the victims?
Sorry to ramble. This story really bothers me, so unbelievably cruel.
Not yet.Are Lori and Linda Peugot on the rule out list yet?
LE has implied in response to questions at a press conference that they have more information about the barrels than has been made public. And there have been persistent rumors that at least some of the victims were wrapped in something. In response to questions about what else might have been in the barrels, LE has in the past refused to answer."
LE has implied in response to questions at a press conference that they have more information about the barrels than has been made public. And there have been persistent rumors that at least some of the victims were wrapped in something. In response to questions about what else might have been in the barrels, LE has in the past refused to answer.
Thank you, that's interesting information.
I am in New York, so I understand the problems associated with digging.
Although your theory, that he could have found the barrels is reasonable. I can't help but think that the police went 15 years, before finding 2 barrels. That makes it hard to believe he got that lucky. 2 other things: even if he did find one barrel. Would it be worth the time and trouble stuffing them in there - then searching around for another one that took the police 15 years to find, to stuff the other victims into?
"Some days later, on Nov. 10, 1985, hunters stumbled upon the scene and discovered that the tattered plastic covered the naked, partially dismembered, and decomposing bodies of a young woman and little girl."Thank you, that's interesting information.
I am in New York, so I understand the problems associated with digging.
Although your theory, that he could have found the barrels is reasonable. I can't help but think that the police went 15 years, before finding 2 barrels. That makes it hard to believe he got that lucky. 2 other things: even if he did find one barrel. Would it be worth the time and trouble stuffing them in there - then searching around for another one that took the police 15 years to find, to stuff the other victims into?
It's a good question why there was a 15-year gap. For quite some time after they found the second barrel, there was some question as to whether it had been placed there later; this most recent press conference seems pretty sure that they were all killed at the same time.
I don't think they've ever released the exact location of where the two barrels were relative to each other and to the area landmarks; it's possible the second one was outside the first search area. Or something. It seems like every time a crime isn't solved, people want to blame LE for botching the investigation; in this case it seems like there might be truth to at least some things being overlooked.
"Cody said he did not fault police for failing to find the drum earlier because it was a football field away from where the first one was found and wouldn’t have been considered part of the initial crime scene.
Police suspect that the two drums were dumped in the same spot. During the investigation of the initial discovery, police learned that children had rolled the drum into the woods and abandoned it when the trash bag tumbled out, unaware of its contents, Cody said."
Someone should humour me and get Beverly Potts ruled out...For ease of reference, here is the NamUS list latest updated ruled out list:
First Name Last Name Year of Birth State LKA
Nancy Baird 1952 Utah
Nancy Baird 1952 Utah
Rachael Garden 1964 New Hampshire
Sharon Giusti 1943 Washington
Cynthia Goodling 1958 Florida
Pamela Hobley 1954 Michigan
Rhonda Labbe 1956 Massachusetts
Ella Beth Lodermeier 1948 South Dakota
Linda Lovell 1948 Montana
Anne Manchester 1954 Delaware
Anne Manchester 1954 Delaware
Aleca Manning 1952 Arizona
Aleca Manning 1953 Arizona
Linda Nickell 1955 Michigan
Linda Nickell 1955 Michigan
Patricia Otto 1952 Idaho
Kristina Perkins 1953 Arizona
Wanda Priddy 1958 Texas
Laureen Rahn 1966 New Hampshire
Patricia Schmidt 1964 Virginia
Patricia Schmidt 1964 Virginia
Diane Schulte 1954 Idaho
Kathleen Shea 1959 Pennsylvania
Kimberly Stewart 1956 California
Mary Stuart 1945 California
It's a good question why there was a 15-year gap. For quite some time after they found the second barrel, there was some question as to whether it had been placed there later; this most recent press conference seems pretty sure that they were all killed at the same time.
I don't think they've ever released the exact location of where the two barrels were relative to each other and to the area landmarks; it's possible the second one was outside the first search area. Or something. It seems like every time a crime isn't solved, people want to blame LE for botching the investigation; in this case it seems like there might be truth to at least some things being overlooked.
Is it possible to determine what these barrels were used for? That could help narrow down where they were taken from, and perhaps provide new clues.
"Some days later, on Nov. 10, 1985, hunters stumbled upon the scene and discovered that the tattered plastic covered the naked, partially dismembered, and decomposing bodies of a young woman and little girl."
"The woman and oldest girl died of blunt force trauma to the head, but the cause of death could not be determined for the younger two. Police said it appeared that the woman and oldest girl had been partially dismembered to fit into the steel drum."
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...nues-baffle/I7n4d1NKACqfFhnIwAnVVP/story.html