Gerkin: there were times where I know he would, when she could get hold of him, he would emphasize that its extremely important to check in at these times... trying to put this succinctly, because if she was out of contact with him too long... bad things would happen, and the connotation was that... [objection]
Reasking the question now.. We were talking about how the defendant would react when she didn't follow his directions... Gerkin: If things didn't go the way he planned them, you brought it up previously, he used doomsday ... brought up on a regular basis ... doomsday is that short circuit I described earlier would happen, and if take everything he said at face value, that people would be dead ...
Trial Queen Sharee ‏@TrialQnSharee 46s
Roberta: "If things didn't go the way #SethMazzaglia planned them, the short circuit I described earlier would happen & pl would b dead"
So, in other words, if Seth Mazzaglia failed to get sexual satisfaction in the manner of his preference someone was going to be hurt or dead. His short circuit would blow and cause doomsday. #yesallwomen
So, in other words, if Seth Mazzaglia failed to get sexual satisfaction in the manner of his preference someone was going to be hurt or dead. His short circuit would blow and cause doomsday. #yesallwomen
She said in the first hours of their 'intellectual' discussion when they first met that he told her about these personas and such, and during the first days she performed oral on him, why in the world didn't she feel threatened by his Doomsday/circuit blowing thinking and make like the wind and blow, rather than b.j.ing him? Everything about their friendship seems off kilter.
o/t Retweeted by wusa9
Sue Baldwin ‏@WatchWUSA9 3m
A breakup. One last hug. Was she walking into her own murder? @48Hours 'Live to Tell' Saturday at 10p on @WUSA9 pic.twitter.com/35Flqca3kI
Atty Barth is asking for a mistrial... telling the judge... The last witness, said that Seth, apparently told her, that if Kat didn't respond to a schedule, that he would commit murder. Barth says it violates the constituion... in the context of this case, the evidence is cumulative - the character testimony,y this witness.. brings to a fever pitch evidence to the jury that he was violent and had deadly intentions... can't be undone by juror instruction ...
Atty Geoffrey Ward is countering, saying Gerkin didn't answer in the way they expected... that the state did not have any ulterior motives... he believes they could be told that the testimony should be stricken... does not believe it rises to mistrial.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.