HauntsForHope
Southern Sleuther
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,747
- Reaction score
- 47
Then how would Kat's DNA get inside his panties the same as Lizzi's?
Why wouldn't it? His parts are covered, not hers :blushing:
Then how would Kat's DNA get inside his panties the same as Lizzi's?
Why wouldn't it? His parts are covered, not hers :blushing:
Atty Davis harkens back to Kat's purse that police collected from Kat's workplace the day she was arrested, and asks the Detective if the tablet computer she had inside it had been forensically examined.. he says he's not absolutely sure a tablet was taken because he was not there, but does not believe it was checked it if was taken.
by Jen Crompton/WMUR 10:55 AM
Read more: http://livewire.wmur.com/Event/State_vs_Mazzaglia#ixzz34v7oIxJJ
You think he put on his undies with the condom still on?
If I never hear the word "Underpants" again, it will be too soon.uke:
Even with a condom the ummmm....area around the base of his equipment would still have contact with her fluids....his pubic hair would still be touching hers.... I would try describe this in more detail but I fear the mods :scared:
You can still transfer touch DNA, I guess is what I am getting at.
KWIM?
UNDERPANTS!!
National Lampoon's Vacation - Dodge City - YouTube
1:27 mark....just for you Softail! :giggle:
EDIT- My ex used to love that scene, he frequently would yell that to people.
Hello WS Friends. Missed you all today and i've got some catching up to do. I attended a real life murder trial in my city that is expected to last through next week. Really interesting trial with good DT and PT. Back later.
:seeya:
Hello WS Friends. Missed you all today and i've got some catching up to do. I attended a real life murder trial in my city that is expected to last through next week. Really interesting trial with good DT and PT. Back later.
:seeya:
No clue :blush:
I think skigirl is verified, perhaps she can get you started?
ETA- Or perhaps Softail can post a link for you? :giggle:
Why didn't I think of that?!? :facepalm:
Alright, but this theory goes back to no threesome, right? He can't be wearing a condom with one of them and not the other if it was. After LM's death, they called their friends, he would have put the 'panties" on then. They left the apartment, returned, he jumped into the shower and she threw out the clothes...according to her lying butt.
Only if you believe their version. What it proves is that he had unprotected sex with Lizzie. Whether you think it was consentual or not is another matter. That's what the defense brought on cross, that it was up for debate. It doesn't prove rape, only sex. Which makes me happy because it's another piece of the puzzle that fits nicely.
I'm convinced there was no consent. So ANY sex between them was a sexual assault.