NH NH - Elizabeth Marriott, 19, Durham, 9 Oct 2012 - # 9 *S. Mazzaglia guilty*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #121
And what did he mean by "he'll take it up with the jury"?

I believe he meant he'd lie to the jury about the scientific evidence.
 
  • #122
I couldn't figure out where he was going with the heart thing--but then my mind started wandering.....

I realized I needed more bananas. So there's that :)
 
  • #123
Again, seems to me that plan C is to blame the other person. I think these two are still in love, not exes, they decided to blame the other one, pretend to be turning on each other, laughing inside all the while. If no one's story matches, and so far, no one's does...they expect to be set free. I hope this jury can take what little they have and find guilt here.

I have really wondered about this as well. It has definitely crossed my mind that they are just biding their time and plan to be together after the trial.

Two reasons I really dont think so though: 1) They are really not that smart or clever, and 2) Having gotten immunity, Kat could have just said that she killed Lizzi and Seth had nothing to do with it. Seth would walk and Kat would be out in a year and a half

I totally agree with you that we have not gotten the whole truth from anyone.
 
  • #124
Its back on? Mine isnt.
 
  • #125
Prosecution should just let well enough alone. Barth did his own case in with this witness.

I agree - he should keep this very short.
 
  • #126
  • #127
  • #128
And what did he mean by "he'll take it up with the jury"?

Believe Barth named either (former? retired?) a Medical Examiner or Forensic Path from CT whom Witness acknowledged she was familiar with.

Barth mentioned they don't always see things t same way.
 
  • #129
At least Barth is smart enough to know when to fold 'em now.
 
  • #130
State Rests.
 
  • #131
Wow!!!
 
  • #132
They rested and no ex gf?
 
  • #133
And what did he mean by "he'll take it up with the jury"?

snarky. Like flipping someone the bird after they have left and shut the door.
 
  • #134
oh rebuttal
 
  • #135
Believe Barth named either (former? retired?) a Medical Examiner or Forensic Path from CT whom she acknowledged she was familiar with.

Barth mentioned they don't always see things t same way.

Question for our legal expert (minor4th): Can Barth get up and opine during his closing arguments about scientific matters based on his representation of beliefs of a witness that hasn't actually been called to testify?
 
  • #136
State rests!! Good way to end their case in chief.
 
  • #137
At this time, the State rests.
 
  • #138
Question for our legal expert: Can Barth get up and opine about scientific matters based on his representation of beliefs of a witness that hasn't actually been called to testify?

Hes not supposed to but he probably will anyway. It will be interesting to see if the defense has a medical expert to help their case
 
  • #139
  • #140
Will the Defense put on a case?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
130
Guests online
974
Total visitors
1,104

Forum statistics

Threads
632,407
Messages
18,626,082
Members
243,142
Latest member
HOTnizz
Back
Top