Jersey*Girl
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2008
- Messages
- 10,266
- Reaction score
- 166
Here's what I take out of what he's saying. Is he blaming the search procedure or the LE in general. Because there was a specific tip/complaint about the JR and DR stealing bikes the morning of Saturday before she went there. Had cops showed up with a warrant about the stolen bikes they most likely wouldn't have had a chance to see her and kill her.
I think the only valid point is if they had investigated the saturday morning tip about the boys stealing bikes they wouldn't have had a chance to kill her.
I haven't heard about this tip. Do you have a link to that story?
I read this as well. Apparently there was a complaint or call into the CPD on Saturday about the boys stealing bikes, yada yada. No idea if they started investigating it or not, bc IMO that might be something that would be scoped out first...maybe ask around, place a call to the house, or what have you. It's not something that they'd have to drop whatever they're doing to act on ASAP. It's a bike. A bike.
I understand the logic that if le acted on the complaint, which we haven't been privy to yet, that there's a possibility the boys could have been arrested. What I don't understand is how these people can put all the blame on the le when Autumn's own father hadn't even checked in with her for hours, HOURS, didn't know if she arrived at her friend's house or not, actually came out & said he just "assumed" whatever, I mean this is seriously akin to the pot calling the kettle black. It's ri dic u lous.