NJ NJ, Rahway, WhtFem Doe Network 1211UFNJ, 18-22, March 1887

HmmMysterious

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2021
Messages
2,159
Reaction score
13,995
  • #1
1211UFNJ

Oldest case on the Doe Network. There has been talk of identifying this Jane Doe through DNA and the family tree method AKA genetic genealogy.

Rahway Jane Doe.jpg


Date of discovery: March 25, 1887
Location of discovery: Rahway, Union County, New Jersey
Estimated date of death: Either March 24 or March 25, 1887
State of remains: Recognizable face
Cause of death: Homicide by blunt and sharp force

Physical Description​

Estimated age: 18-22 years old
Race: White
Sex: Female
Height: 5'2
Weight: Unknown
Hair color: Brown (Alleged)
Eye color: Blue (Alleged)

Identifinders​

DNA: Unknown
Fingerprints: Unknown
Dentals: Unknown

Clothing and Personal Items​

Clothing: Dark green cashmere dress trimmed with green feathers, yellow kid gloves, foreign good shoes, bonnet, black straw hat with red velvet trimmings, black dotted veil, and a fur cape.
Jewelry: Jewelry of unknown description (possibly rings)
Additional personal items: Small satchel, small basket of eggs, and an umbrella

Circumstances of Discovery​

Four brothers traveling to work at the felt mills by Bloodgood's Pond in Clark, New Jersey found the decedent's body lying off Central Avenue near Jefferson Avenue several hundred feet from the Central Avenue Bridge over the Rahway Bridge. Her body lay at the side of the road in a pool of blood that had frozen due to cold weather. Her throat had been cut twice from ear to ear and the right side of her face was extensively bruised from a severe beating. Her torn cape was found next to her and her body was surrounded by large footprints.

An officer found a small black bag near the river that contained small articles, some that might've belonged to a man. The young woman's basket had 9 eggs of which 6 were broken. Across the fence, a pen knife with a turquoise handle was found.

The young woman was embalmed and photographed dressed in the clothes she was found in. Rahway Police allegedly still have these photos. Rahway Jane Doe's murder was the subject of national headlines and many viewed her body, but she (and her killer) still remains unidentified.

She is buried in Rahway's Cemetery.

Sources:​

Rahway murder of 1887 - Wikipedia
The Rahway Jane Doe from March 25, 1887 (New Jersey)

Investigating Agency​

Agency Name: Rahway Police Department
Agency Contact Person: N/A
Agency Phone Number: 732-827-2200
Agency E-Mail: N/A
Agency Case Number: Unknown
 

Attachments

  • Rahway Jane Doe.jpg
    Rahway Jane Doe.jpg
    44.3 KB · Views: 13
  • #2
 
Last edited:
  • #3
 
Last edited:
  • #4
@MadMcGoo I was about to say I wasn't sure this girl was positively Mary Maltby until I saw your second post. Thank you for taking the time to find these articles :)
 
  • #5
@MadMcGoo I was about to say I wasn't sure this girl was positively Mary Maltby until I saw your second post. Thank you for taking the time to find these articles :)
I tried posting everything in the same post to avoid confusion, but it wouldn't let me attach more than 10 images! :DThese have a few more details about her murder. I've been trying to find a photo of Mary since she resembled the woman, but I've had no luck so far.
 
  • #6
Says here that a postmortem photograph is available in the March 30, 1887 edition of New York World.
 
  • #7
Researching, Rahway today's a suburb of NYC, basically. It has a history as an artisinal city and in the 1880s was diversifying in terms of manufacturing as it had been a leader in carriage production, and carriages werre in decline. Rahway PD (and pretty sure Rahway as such itself?) was created in 1858, Nobody recognized this woman, so I'm guessing she wasn't local. Rahway was along established rail lines and one could reach Rahway from NYC in just over a half an hour even back then, per one source. Per another source, someone at the rail station had said they saw a young woman heading off from there towards (I think?) Elm Street. I saw another source noting a peculiar man noted at the rail station. I'm wondering if she was perhaps coming into the area looking for or interviewing for some position. I know she had some feathers on her clothing, but if it was minimal (and it says it was "trim"), I'm wondering if she might have been trying to acquire a job as a governess, perhaps she is from abroad and she is going to be teaching a language. The fur cape in that climate at that time probably wouldn't be considered so much extravagent as fashionably functional. But I think if she already had an interview arranged, the family receiving her would have put two and two together and she'd be identified now. She's about average height for her era. She's also of marrying age for her era, and I'm seeing there were a lot of German, Irish, Italian and British immigrants to NJ at the time and some were bringing brides in from abroad, this wasn't just a Western regional phenomenon in this period. She's pretty, "sturdily built" per one source, brown hair & blue eyes. She had the foreign made shoes and generally European clothing, so I think she emigrated. Don't think she came over with parents because she'd likely (?) have been identified.

Where was she going to stay? As a young woman traveler in this period, they might be asking for letters of reference as young unescorted women travelers were looked upon with suspicion. She might have had a letter of reference so she could secure lodging. Maybe that's why the bloody hand dug into her pocket, maybe the writer of that letter was the murderer, who drew her to the area in the first place. Researching further, I'm seeing that men in the British Empire fleeing romantic partners came over to the US in big numbers, some even leaving women with actual wedding dates arranged. This is a documented "thing" in the 1870s onward through the turn of the century. What if this is an abandoned fiancee or even daughter of the murderer, someone left behind in a European country? Maybe a fiancee who has some dirt on the killer, or some hold, perhaps something financial. She's nicely dressed, maybe she has given him money, maybe quite a lot of money, something she acquired through inheritance, expecting to finally be brought out there to marry. The NJ laws were changing right in this timeframe regarding women's property rights. If he's been stringing her along the whole time and in fact was spending all her money while he in reality has married someone else, the victim's presence might have become enough of a "thorn in his side" to bring her out and kill her.

Horrible regardless of the motives or anything else. RIP.
 
Last edited:

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
268
Guests online
3,029
Total visitors
3,297

Forum statistics

Threads
640,362
Messages
18,758,797
Members
244,654
Latest member
mrsbumble
Back
Top