Hair of the Dog
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
- Messages
- 685
- Reaction score
- 11,287
I am joining the search tomorrow but it us local (Freehold). I hesitated because the fact the *** (yes, intentional acronym) pinged at 3am to 9 am right after she went missing in the Staten Island woods. Nowhere near Freehold.
But then it occurred to me that although he wasn’t smart enough to delete childmeta-data from his phone, he might be phone savvy enough to understand the police can track his phone. Accordingly, he could’ve easily left his phone right there in the wooded area and retrieved it the next day. I do not think this is far-fetched. In fact, I know everybody is going to say oh, he obviously was stupid as shown by having child
on his phone, but I think that’s different. Someone may be unaware how to scrub their phone of metadata or searches, but everybody knows about GPS. Everyone, especially ***’s age, knows that their cell phone location is visible. I would say he knew it. If that is the case, he would not have brought his phone with him and bring Stephanie to the woods.
Number two, if police were so sure he was stupid enough to have his phone on him in the woods for six hours, which is the exact average number of hours it takes to dig a grave, then why aren’t police searching the Staten Island woods every single day? Seems to me that if the police are sure the cell phone pinged all night in the woods in Staten Island woods, they must not be too sure he was actually with his phone. If they did, and they definitely believed he was with his phone in the woods all night, they would be searching the hell out of that area.
Also, someone on here said the area of that search would’ve been a lot to cover for a dog. A trained sniffer. That’s not the case. Yes, if you want to go inch by inch methodically, it will take a while. However, that’s not how it’s done. The dogs would be allowed to run loose and they would smell a cadaver while running around. If they didn’t, THEN the trainers would start from the beginning and go methodically over every inch. But I’m not aware of any dogs being set loose. Cadaver dogs. Has anyone heard anything about this?
In any event beside speculation, can anyone comment on the reliability or evidence of reliability of the cell phone pinging and the ***’s Location? I haven’t been reading every single inch of the news. Also, because I will be searching locally tomorrow, what are your thoughts on local? We all know that she left her house without her phone. That was highly unusual of course and I think that means he either threatened her by gunpoint to get into the car (or maybe knife) it she agreed to go sit in the car with him and talk whereupon he took off before she could demur and go get her phone first. Or....he could have said “let’s go for a walk” and so any bad act could have taken place locally. Thoughts?
The topic of a phone being left in one place while the owner went to a different place was discussed recently on the Barbara Thomas thread. WS member @PaulR, a verified software and computer tech advised that a cellphone at rest is not going to behave the same as a cell phone in motion and while he was not comfortable going into the specifics on a public forum, he stated that basic forensics would uncover that quickly and would be used by LE to drill down on a suspect's story. If anyone is interested in reading the back and forth and various scenarios it begins on Thread 12, Page 9, Post 177.
My 3 scenarios for how he may have made contact with Stephanie the night she disappeared:
He entered her house before she got home, laid in wait and overpowered her once she got inside.
He convinced her to open the door for him then attacked and overpowered her.
He was stalking her, waiting for her to get home and incapacitated her when she got out of her car, then used her keys to access her house.
IMO he took her to S.I. because it was his comfort zone.
Wishing you and all of the searchers all the best searching for Stephanie tomorrow, Godspeed.