GUILTY NJ - Trial of Christopher Gregor Allegedly Beat 6-Year-OId Son to Death #2 *NG murder, Guilty endangering welfare, agg manslaughter*

  • #781
Sentence:

Don't give maximum sentence.
 
  • #782
He won't get max sentence.
 
  • #783
20 yrs
 
  • #784
Only 25 years.
 
  • #785
Won’t give him max because he has no prior record!

Count 1 - 5 years
Count 2 - 20 years (has to complete 85% before release)

Consecutive!!! Judge says the treadmill incident is separate and making this concurrent would be giving the defendant a “free crime” on that one.
 
  • #786
Judge said maximum sentence is legally not sustainable.

Since CG has no notable criminal record...

20 years, subject to 80% time served

And 5 years for the abuse
 
  • #787
Laws need to be different - stricter when it's against a child or against children. A child is defenseless. Laws need changed every where! moo
 
  • #788
So we are hearing 20 + 5 years and based on discussion almost sounds like concurrent. Until I heard judge just say, no ‘free’ crimes and timing of offenses and separate acts. Still seems need a fingers crossed emoji. MOO
 
  • #789
Separate incidences

Judge rules consecutive sentences.

So 25 years.
 
  • #790
Won’t give him max because he has no prior record!

Count 1 - 5 years
Count 2 - 20 years (has to complete 85% before release)
I’ve followed many trials over the years and when a “expert Witness” takes the stand they go through a process of being “qualified”.

Does this not happen at a hearing?

From everything posted here regarding this witness it appears that Odinism is not her area of expertise.
Makes me so angry. Because the history is there, but "someone" went behind CG and cleaned up his messes.

Maybe if CG was held accountable for smaller things, we wouldn't be here.

And Corey still would.

JMO
 
  • #791
It's hard to hear the minimizing of Corey's abuse....
 
  • #792
  • #793
CG sentenced to 25 years in prison.
 
  • #794
Let's end with Corey. May you fly high.
 

Attachments

  • AETTYD3LY5CNBBDFTV3GWHEAKY.jpeg
    AETTYD3LY5CNBBDFTV3GWHEAKY.jpeg
    78.5 KB · Views: 1
  • #795
Boy that is getting off light 85% of 25 plus time served. I think judge might have gone stronger but feared any appeal based on standards.
 
  • #796
Sad day. No winners.

5 years for the kind of abuse that leads to homicide.

He stole 70+ years from Corey. And will serve 25, less timed served, less adjustments.

He robbed Corey of becoming the father he (CG) could never be.

Jmo
 
  • #797
He’s 32 so he’ll be early 50s by the time he gets out. The issue is that the jury found him NG of the murder charge otherwise he’d do life. So the way the law is written for this conviction it allows him to be out after a long sentence. Smh.
 
  • #798
Separate incidences

Judge rules consecutive sentences.

So 25 years.
I’m really hoping the judge did it this way to minimize the chances of a successful appeal. Making sure the record is clear that all factors were considered and some rulings were “pro-defense.” It is a pretty light sentence but maybe the judge has seen extreme sentences over ruled and it is VERY clear that certain enabling parents will appeal until all appeals are exhausted with high priced attorneys. NJ tends to be a bit on the “sympathetic” side - I’m in NJ.

ETA - weki is right - the jury verdict also limited the sentence. A good example of “sympathetic” NJ. I 100% would have convicted of murder.
 
  • #799
I noted that his mother was not anywhere near Dad if there at all. I think this may have caused a rift between them and marriage in jeopardy..just a guess. His Dad is really something. CG is pleased with himself as he sits there...he will be back on the streets at some point and deserved much more.
 
  • #800
I’m really hoping the judge did it this way to minimize the chances of a successful appeal. Making sure the record is clear that all factors were considered and some rulings were “pro-defense.” It is a pretty light sentence but maybe the judge has seen extreme sentences over ruled and it is VERY clear that certain enabling parents will appeal until all appeals are exhausted with high priced attorneys. NJ tends to be a bit on the “sympathetic” side - I’m in NJ.

ETA - weki is right - the jury verdict also limited the sentence. A good example of “sympathetic” NJ. I 100% would have convicted of murder.
i would have gone with murder too.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
131
Guests online
3,110
Total visitors
3,241

Forum statistics

Threads
632,988
Messages
18,634,543
Members
243,363
Latest member
Pawsitive
Back
Top