CastleCat16
Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2025
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 68
Okay, I'm going to try this again.
The circumstances of recovery from the original post include a couple of items I haven't seen discussed yet:
Circumstances of Recovery: Neighbor was walking on neighboring property and found skull, properties miles apart; hadn't seen female neighbor in 2 years; trailer door ripped/wide open; journal found outside complaining of neighbor, Canadian passport for female found outside
Is the neighbor that found the skull the same neighbor that was complained about in the found journal? Was the neighbor trespassing because they hadn't seen the female neighbor, or were they just trespassing? What were the complaints in the journal? Trespassing?
How long did it seem the found items had been outside? How long had the skull been outside.
Is it possible Fiana's name change(s) came with significant lifestyle change(s)?
One of my thoughts is that potentially this journal entry was written by the person who murdered our doe, and that the 'neighbour' they were complaining about is the neighbour who hadn't been seen in ages not the neighbour who discovered the skull.
Unfortunately, the correlation between the neighbour, the skull, the female neighbour they hadn't seen in ages, the neighbour mentioned in the journal and the passport isn't stated, so we can only speculate. I would have thought that if the neighbour recognised the woman in the passport photo as their neighbour, they would have said so and this would be indicated in the report, which to me suggests the skull/female neighbour/passport holder may not all be the same person.
It's frustrating that there is so much info in this case which normally would lead to a quick identification (address, neighbours, potential skull for recon, potential ID, possible motivation for murder which could raise suspects) but a lack of clarity and specifics publicly available means from a non-LE perspective looking in its quite difficult to understand the case. Certainly, the implication everyone appears to be operating on is that the passport woman and the doe are the same person (hence why the photo is put as the 'profile pic' of the case), but there's nowhere actually concretely confirming that fact.
As for the latter point:
I think, given the fact that we can only locate a NM PO box registered under a F.D. Haarsma/ Kim Haarsma and that some others managed to locate Airbnb (or Canadian equivalent) reviews by an account called Fiana D, it could be extrapolated that she was potentially travelling with a partner (maybe living in a van etc.?) and had no fixed address, instead occasionally booking into airbnb's in New Mexico.
The lack of other sources mentioning Fiana/Kim or any of her immediate family [if this Kim is the daughter of Ken and Joyce identified above] could also point to a significant lifestyle change - perhaps a break from the church which appears central to a lot of potential relatives lives (found references to Kim being part of the Calgary Christ Moravian church congregation when younger, whilst some of her father's siblings and children appear linked to the Mennonites). If the immediate family all changed their names and/or moved away and went no contact with other relatives that could explain why it's difficult to locate any trace of them online.