CUCKOOHEAD
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2012
- Messages
- 5,540
- Reaction score
- 12
Thank you for getting her name straight. I never got her 'legal' last name.
Small wonder it's hard to keep track she's had a few different names......

Thank you for getting her name straight. I never got her 'legal' last name.
Do you think the jury can see through it? I never know how to read a jury, can't determine if how I absorb info is the same way they do any more. Especially after the CA jury.
Oh lord, this is voir dire, the jury is out.
Were you lying then or are you lying now.....no I was scared to talk to him.....
Direct knowledge? She may have said that.....defense wants to play it for her....for each one of his questions........
OK this is funny!
Is the jury out? Defense said we can send the jury out and play the tape for each question I want you to answer............I assumed the jury was in.
So they have to pre-qualify a juror before they testify?
Twitter news guy in the courtroom said Serna didn't want this witness to testify and tried to keep her out. Also said 'mistresses' are beginning to testify--wonder if that means Rose is the first in line?
Twitter news guy in the courtroom said Serna didn't want this witness to testify and tried to keep her out. Also said 'mistresses' are beginning to testify--wonder if that means Rose is the first in line?
It'll be a looooooonnnnngggggg line, if they all testify. :floorlaugh:
OK, so the jury is now going out. In order to hear the tape. If the tape is in evidence why can't the jury hear it?
So the jury did just leave? Cause holy smokes I cannot keep it straight....poor jury....in and out....like poptarts!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.