No intruder?

[Agatha_C]

Good point Beck, why JR? If there are only two, why haven't they caught one yet? I mean and no offense here but if HOTYH, can figure out who the two are couldn't anyone else in LE, DA,FBI and so on.

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

Even if I knew (for sure) which middle aged Asian man you are speaking of, why would he kill JonBenet? If he had a problem with John's business, believe me, it wasn't Access Graphics, it would have been the mac daddy, the one with the real power, Lockheed Martin, so why not kill their president's kid? I guess that's what you are referring to, right? Or is there another reason you feel this man killed her?

I'm not sure it was ever JR at all. It seems more likely JBR via pageants.

Just curious...anybody know if its officially Jonbenet, Jon-benet or Jon-Benet?

 

[BBB167893]

Did he or did he not say 'revolutionary connotations' and 'harks back to foreign (there goes that 'foreign' word again) powers'.

He did, but it's a bit different when you examine the context. He also said that it was more likely that someone was trying to conjure up that image, not that they were legit.

I'll give you some time to answer that.

No need.

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

He did, but it's a bit different when you examine the context. He also said that it was more likely that someone was trying to conjure up that image, not that they were legit.



No need.

Bye bye.

 

[BBB167893]

Just curious...anybody know if its officially Jonbenet, Jon-benet or Jon-Benet?

None. It's JonBenet with an accent mark.

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

None. It's JonBenet with an accent mark.

It was actually a rhetorical question.

 

[Agatha_C]

Not one question answered..... How do you respect that?

 

[Holdontoyourhat]

JonBenét Patricia Ramsey (August 6, 1990 – December 25, 1996) was an American child whose murder at age 6 attracted extensive media coverage. Such coverage often focused on her participation in child beauty pageants, her parents' affluence and various unusual aspects of the case as well as questions regarding police handling of the case.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JonBen%C3%A9t_Ramsey

Main Entry: anomalous Part of Speech: adjective Definition: deviating from normal, usual Synonyms: aberrant, abnormal, atypical, bizarre, divergent, eccentric, exceptional, foreign, heteroclite, incongruous, inconsistent, irregular, odd, peculiar, preternatural, prodigious, rare, strange, unnatural, unorthodox, unrepresentative, untypical, unusual

 

[MurriFlower]

Maddy, you know that I think very much of you and your opinions. But the post the folks are referring to was aimed at me and it was about nothing but starting trouble. Murri was disrespectful and that remark was uncalled for. It does not bother me that she disagrees with my theories whatsoever as I certainly disagree with hers, BUT I would never sink so low as to make a remark like that. I had to defend my friends here because they weren't trying to be snarky. They were trying to defend me.

Beck, you would have to have the most vivid imagination of pretty much anyone on this forum (and that's saying something), coupled with an extremely 'thin skin' and an ability to make yourself seem like the blameless victim. If you find that disrespectful and rude, then complain to management.

 

[joeskidbeck]

Beck, you would have to have the most vivid imagination of pretty much anyone on this forum (and that's saying something), coupled with an extremely 'thin skin' and an ability to make yourself seem like the blameless victim. If you find that disrespectful and rude, then complain to management.

Thank you for not disappointing me, Murri as this is exactly how I expected you to reply. Imagination is not needed when you are looking at actual evidence coupled with an officer saying he saw two blankets, but you can't accept that. Why is that? Is there some reason you cannot believe that is a blanket in that photo? Honestly, why would you take such a cheap shot over an opinion on a photo? Yes, call it whatever you like, it was a cheap shot and you know it.

 

[Agatha_C]

How is it alright for some to attack and not for others? Where, oh where, are the rude police when you need them? At least I attack theories and not the actual person.

Where's the censorship now?

 

[Agatha_C]

Only those that are not RDI are allowed to take cheap shots Beck and have hurt feelings.

 

[joeskidbeck]

Only those that are not RDI are allowed to take cheap shots Beck and have hurt feelings.

That's the conclusion I've come to, Agatha and I can tell you why. We have probably been playing nice for too long. I was raised better than that, though. I will not sink to their level. Period. I stand by my post and I don't give a rat's azz who doesn't like it.

 

[MurriFlower]

Thank you for not disappointing me, Murri as this is exactly how I expected you to reply. Imagination is not needed when you are looking at actual evidence coupled with an officer saying he saw two blankets, but you can't accept that. Why is that? Is there some reason you cannot believe that is a blanket in that photo? Honestly, why would you take such a cheap shot over an opinion on a photo? Yes, call it whatever you like, it was a cheap shot and you know it.

I hate to quote myself, but does anyone remember the interrogation, excuse me, I mean the interview where the detective asks Patsy if JB had a special toy or anything that she had to have at bedtime? She replied that she only had SisterSocks the stuffed cat, but I can't help believe they were trying to get her to say something about her favorite blanket. Lot's of kids carry these blankets around for years. My eight you gs has only just now laid his down for fear his friends will find out and make fun of him. Naw, I said, they probably have one too and don't want you to know about theirs. The thing is, I know that it is too big to be clothes for a six year old and it is too small to be a full size blanket, but it is just right to be the blanket from when she was a baby, the one she held onto every night while she went to sleep. The sad part of this is there is no way to know for sure. Nobody in this family will own up to that blanket under any circumstances, whoever carried it to the basement, knew that JonBenet needed it and that does not point to an intruder

Well, here's the post in question. You have gone on about it being a blanket in the photo (previously you also managed to see a Barbie doll there as well) and decided it is a 'security blanket' (cause your son had one) and of course all this is to (in your own mind) back up RDI because only they would know about a security blanket and hence does not point to an intruder.

In earlier posts, people were saying this was a Barbie nightgown with blood on it!!

 

[Agatha_C]

Murri, I saw nothing in Becks post (that you quoted) to cause such hostility. I find you rude and sarcastic.

 

[joeskidbeck]

Well, here's the post in question. You have gone on about it being a blanket in the photo (previously you also managed to see a Barbie doll there as well) and decided it is a 'security blanket' (cause your son had one) and of course all this is to (in your own mind) back up RDI because only they would know about a security blanket and hence does not point to an intruder.

In earlier posts, people were saying this was a Barbie nightgown with blood on it!!

Other posters believe it is the nightgown, I just don't agree with that. I have seen plenty of Barbie nightgowns and this is too large to be one, add the fact that you cannot see a photo of Barbie on it anywhere and that settles it for me. It is not a gown. It is a blanket. The leap from security blanket is not that hard, Murri. It is a small pink blanket. It's too large to be a doll's blanket and too small to be a bed blanket. What other kinds of blankets are there? Patsy was shown photos of evidence in plastic and she specifically saw a Barbie nightgown because she could see Barbies face on it. Yes, there was a Barbie nightgown on the scene, but this isn't it.

 

[Agatha_C]

Its too big to be a nightgown. I'm with you Beck. it might be a blanket that goes with the barbie gown. Maybe they wanted her to say, thats not the nightie, thats the blanket.

 

[MurriFlower]

Murri, I saw nothing in Becks post (that you quoted) to cause such hostility. I find you rude and sarcastic.

Right back at you!!

 

[MurriFlower]

Other posters believe it is the nightgown, I just don't agree with that. I have seen plenty of Barbie nightgowns and this is too large to be one, add the fact that you cannot see a photo of Barbie on it anywhere and that settles it for me. It is not a gown. It is a blanket. The leap from security blanket is not that hard, Murri. It is a small pink blanket. It's too large to be a doll's blanket and too small to be a bed blanket. What other kinds of blankets are there? Patsy was shown photos of evidence in plastic and she specifically saw a Barbie nightgown because she could see Barbies face on it. Yes, there was a Barbie nightgown on the scene, but this isn't it.

Beck, I have no problem with you seeing it as a blanket. It's all the other stuff you put in there that give me the $*!&@. Drawing a conclusion from it, that is it's a 'security blanket' and it was taken there by the parents not an IDI is a lot of bunkum. The fact that you see it as a blanket is just fine.

 

[Agatha_C]

Murri, why can't Beck have her beliefs. I was told today, that I needed to understand and have more respect for fellow posters beliefs, how do those rules not apply to you. I'm trying to understand the dynamics here. Its like there are different sets of rules for different people and thats confusing.

Everyone here states their beliefs as facts or with an IMO, why do you take issue with Beck having those same rights...

I agree with her, it does not look like a little girls size 6 nightie? Every Barbie nightie I have ever seen is knee length, the longest reached the calves. So, if its not the nightie what is it? We know the white blanket was a favorite and it was with the body. So if the pink cloth is a blanket, what was the purpose of the questioning? Were we seeing the same photo? If not, then its proof of other things we don't know about. Its something to be explored and talked about.

So, is it the questions it brings or the fact that it was Beck bringing it up that bothers you?