Dear Cariis,
I firmly believe that if this horrid shooting had happened anywhere other than Las Vegas then the investigation would be drastically different and far more transparent. In my opinion, this city is run like a powerful business, unlike other cities.
The money and power in Las Vegas control any narrative.
Whilst Las Vegas promotes "what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas" there is a corresponding but opposite message about "surveillance everywhere".
Las Vegas has been successful, up to now, in promoting its safety (surveillance everywhere) as well as the opposing message of a vacation spot where "what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas".
Although these two messages are opposite, (no one sees and everyone sees - what you do) they have worked together to create effective marketing for Las Vegas.
In the 2007 NYT article (below),
"The Strip is famous for its video surveillance of nearly every public inch of casino-resorts, scrutiny to which Mr. Young points as a deterrent for any criminal who does not wish to be caught.
juxtaposed with:
Its a vacation place, Mr. McGoey said. People dont want to be walking around with passports or going through metal detectors or screenings. Its always going to be a relatively soft target.
In other words, the message from Vegas is that it is "safe" to do what you like as well as "you are being watched"
This is only my opinion.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/03/us/03security.html