As this story is unfolding, it's sounding to me like Tammy Meyers was the one with "road rage," and the silver sedan driver had maybe a touch of "road annoyance." Originally, the daughter got annoyed at the sedan driver, who got annoyed back, and there was some sort of either fender bender or somebody brake-checked someone, or there was simply an exchange of words.
Then they all went their separate ways. Then the mom goes home, sends the daughter inside, and gets her son, with his gun, to go looking for the other driver.
Who had the road rage here? The original incident was over. If the mom and her armed son hadn't gone looking for the other driver, there would be nothing to see.
Unless there's even more to the story. Given that the story as originally told appears to have included a fair number of lies and omissions, it makes me wonder how much we can believe about any of it.
Was the mother really giving the daughter driving lessons in a school parking lot? I've seen it reported as "parallel parking lessons" in the parking lot, and also as lessons on "merging and changing lanes." And really -- driving lessons at 11:30 at night? Who does that? Maybe there were no parking lessons at all. Was there perhaps something else, that no one wants to talk about, happening in that parking lot or in the vicinity of the school.
Was the mother really driving when the incident happened? Or might the daughter have been driving, illegally?
Did Mrs. Meyers, her husband, her son, or anyone else in her family know the driver or passengers of the other car? Did they perhaps meet up with them on purpose at that school parking lot, for as-yet-unknown reasons?
The police sure have their work cut out for them, trying to figure out what actually happened that night.
