Police affidavit doesn't say the story changed.
Because I read the affidavit. I know what the police wrote in it.
Please go re-read what I wrote above. I detailed how it was revised.
Did you miss the reporting in the early days of this case? The first few days after the shooting? The original Meyers version of what happened never had Brandon in the car. He was home sleeping, and came out of the house with his gun to return fire at the silver car as it sped away.
Brandon has lied so many times, there's no way the police can be certain of anything. I'm not talking about the father's stories. Brandon himself has lied many times. The warrant isn't the be all and end all. I know you like to view the warrant as fact, but innocent people can be arrested with a warrant. That's why we have a court system; otherwise, police would be judge, jury and executioners.Do you think that LE would put what would essentially be Brandon lying in the warrant when they would have had to have seen surveillance video of of the green car returning to the home and going back?
BBM. I myself found, after reading the arrest warrant affidavit several times, that I'm more suspicious about the sequence of events. IMO, EN's friends accounts and the son's and daughter's accounts differ in several crucial areas that convince me that the incident could not have unfolded the way the victim's family members described it.
I haven't seen anyone claim or imply that TM deserved to be gunned down -- not for any reason whatsoever.
Under the scenario that I think is more likely, TM would be even more of an innocent victim than she would be in the story claimed by the Meyerses. I don't think she went home and told her son to arm up and go hunting for EN. I don't think she was even in the car that evening, for any of incident.
Brandon has lied so many times, there's no way the police can be certain of anything. I'm not talking about the father's stories. Brandon himself has lied many times. The warrant isn't the be all and end all. I know you like to view the warrant as fact, but innocent people can be arrested with a warrant. That's why we have a court system; otherwise, police would be judge, jury and executioners.
He's not disregarding the rumors. He is investigating them. Just as some of us want to investigate them. We just have more limited resources. I guarantee he is discussing them with his team. Just like some of us want to discuss them here with this websleuth's team. When LE is investigating and lawyers are creating defenses, they BRAINSTORM with each other to determine what scenarios fit the facts and what things need to be further investigated.I think many of us can agree that there is a dearth of facts regarding this case. My concern is that when we're discussing facts, rumors get thrown into the mix and discussed as if they are facts, when they're not.
Any solid theory or solid scenario must be based on verified facts, otherwise it's nothing more than baseless conjecture and rumor-mongering.
'Somebody-said-that-somebody-said-they-heard-from-someone-else' is not a reliable foundation upon which to base a solid scenario.
Even Conrad Claus, when asked by a reporter in a recent interview about rumors that were circulating, told the reporter that he wants to investigate those rumors to determine if they have any foundation in fact. He refused to comment on the rumors. He refused to take those rumors and run with them.
Why? Because they might not pan out as factual or truthful and he wants the truth - not egg on his face.
Who was the one telling that story? Wasn't it the father? He was not even there.
He's not disregarding the rumors. He is investigating them. Just as some of us want to investigate them. We just have more limited resources. I guarantee he is discussing them with his team. Just like some of us want to discuss them here with this websleuth's team. When LE is investigating and lawyers are creating defenses, they BRAINSTORM with each other to determine what scenarios fit the facts and what things need to be further investigated.
Remember the wording the captain used when talking about the comprehensive report? He said they needed time to put together something that makes sense. I specifically remember "makes sense." With all the lies they were told by the Meyerses, LE was probably equally challenged when writing the arrest warrant. It's not perfect because this case isn't perfect.But that wasn't my question. Do you think that LE would put easily provable lies in a warrant?
Brandon has lied so many times, there's no way the police can be certain of anything. I'm not talking about the father's stories. Brandon himself has lied many times. The warrant isn't the be all and end all. I know you like to view the warrant as fact, but innocent people can be arrested with a warrant. That's why we have a court system; otherwise, police would be judge, jury and executioners.
That would be a silly thing for police to include in a Criminal Complaint/Declaration of Warrant/Summons. These documents are not intended to include every piece of evidence. If so, there would be no need for discovery before a trial because the defense would have access to everything right there in the warrant.Police affidavit doesn't say the story changed.
Remember the wording the captain used when talking about the comprehensive report? He said they needed time to put together something that makes sense. I specifically remember "makes sense." With all the lies they were told by the Meyerses, LE was probably equally challenged when writing the arrest warrant. It's not perfect because this case isn't perfect.
I'll bet LE isn't the least bit concerned about the discrepancy of the statement and whatever video there is of the car because they view all that irrelevant to what happened in front of the house. They're focus is on what happened in front of that house, when TM was shot.
Motive is irrelevant to them. That's why they're not interested in the drug aspect of the case. They're not even very interested in the road rage scenario they presented in the warrant. BECAUSE they believe the only important evidence is what happened in front of the house. They think a disproven fact about what happened away from the Meyers' house isn't doing to disprove what happened in front of the Meyers' house.
They only have what they can work with---a bunch of lies they needed to sift through. They picked the lies that matched the other evidence as best as they could. If they waited for it to make sense and be perfect, an arrest warrant would have never been written and nobody would have been arrested. That's how screwed up the testimony has been from the Meyerses. LE did the best they could with what the Meyers family members told them.
That would be a silly thing for police to include in a Criminal Complaint/Declaration of Warrant/Summons. These documents are not intended to include every piece of evidence. If so, there would be no need for discovery before a trial because the defense would have access to everything right there in the warrant.
I don't think one video camera can prove or disprove who was in the car and where the cars went after they passed the camera. There could have been various times one car eluded the other briefly, only to be found on another street out of the camera's site.Sonjay stated he/she feels they never came back to the house. Brandon can lie about that all he wants, but if it is on video, the lie will not stand and, yes, the police can be certain about that.
I don't think one video camera can prove or disprove who was in the car and where the cars went after they passed the camera. There could have been various times one car eluded the other briefly, only to be found on another street out of the camera's site.
I would think that if a witness in a murder investigation had lied, investigators would be very interested in following up on that, to determine if the witness had been truthful in their statements to investigators.
These LV Metro homicide detectives have been around the block more than a few times. I trust that they know how to conduct a homicide investigation and that they know to follow-up if they suspect a witness may have been deceptive.
Some of the discrepancies came right out of Brandon's mouth. I posted video a while back of Brandon claiming he promised LE to keep quiet about EN because they said it would hinder their investigation. Meanwhile, they never told LE about EN. We can debate what the captain meant when he said it was accurate that they didn't learn about the Meyerses knowing EN OR we can acknowledge that LE does not state anywhere in the warrant that Brandon or his sister named EN. Not anywhere in the warrant does it say that. If Brandon had told them and they asked him to be quiet, it would include in the warrant that Brandon identified EN as the shooter. It doesn't. So, there is an example of just one lie Brandon told that's caught on video, and it's a pretty big lie IMO.I think many of the so-called 'discrepancies' can be traced back to RM. As you stated - he wasn't there.
Remember the wording the captain used when talking about the comprehensive report? He said they needed time to put together something that makes sense. I specifically remember "makes sense." With all the lies they were told by the Meyerses, LE was probably equally challenged when writing the arrest warrant. It's not perfect because this case isn't perfect.
I'll bet LE isn't the least bit concerned about the discrepancy of the statement and whatever video there is of the car because they view all that irrelevant to what happened in front of the house. They're focus is on what happened in front of that house, when TM was shot.
Motive is irrelevant to them. That's why they're not interested in the drug aspect of the case. They're not even very interested in the road rage scenario they presented in the warrant. BECAUSE they believe the only important evidence is what happened in front of the house. They think a disproven fact about what happened away from the Meyers' house isn't doing to disprove what happened in front of the Meyers' house.
They only have what they can work with---a bunch of lies they needed to sift through. They picked the lies that matched the other evidence as best as they could. If they waited for it to make sense and be perfect, an arrest warrant would have never been written and nobody would have been arrested. That's how screwed up the testimony has been from the Meyerses. LE did the best they could with what the Meyers family members told them.
BBM
They [LE] picked the lies that matched the other evidence as best as they could...
I strongly disagree.
I believe LE based their arrest warrant on the evidence - not on alleged lies.
I have provided video of it previously. It's in one of these threads for you to find if you want to listen to it.BBM
I've seen this claim repeated in these threads many times.
Can you provide links to video footage of BM lying? I would be genuinely interested in viewing any video footage of BM allegedly lying, because if it's true that he lied (and it's captured on video), then I'll re-examine my position.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.