Miss Muffet
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
- Messages
- 2,125
- Reaction score
- 12
I recall early on, a reporter asked LVDA about all of the stories. His response was something along the lines of the jury will only be making decisions on what's presented in court. That means he only intends to present one story.Which version?
Most of the stories came from RM. There are only two stories coming from KM and BM---the first story in the media and LVDA's latest version. As far as we know, there isn't anything in police documents about KM and BM's first story. Even LVPD's latest story saying two different cars and two different incidents isn't really a change of story but a clarification of story that's coming from LVDA, not KM and BM. There is no way for KM and BM to know if they were two different cars and two different incidents since neither of them were present both times.
My point is there won't be a billion stories presented in court, and I'll bet LVDA intends to prevent other stories from being admissible. Let's review the very first story. Is there anything showing KM and BM stating there was no first shooting scene? I believe only LVPD makes those statements in the media. Can LVPD say they purposely withheld information about the first shooting scene as a key piece of information to help identify the killer? IIRC, the first shooting scene is used to verify the statements of KK and ZA in the warrant.