NY - Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein arrested, sex trafficking, 6 July 2019 *FOUND DECEASED IN JAIL* #3

[Elley Mae]

Is the DOJ looking for these people? How about Ghislane Maxwell? The evidence is out there, yet no charges have been filed, nor arrests made as these criminals escape. What's up with AG Barr? Is he afraid for some reason to arrest them?

Even though Epstein's death ended his criminal prosecution, US Attorney General Bill Barr has said prosecutors would pursue cases against anyone else involved in his alleged crimes.


Alleged rape victim sues Epstein estate, Britain's Maxwell

.....

Prosecutors are pursuing cases against others involved.

 

[Elley Mae]

Epstein being asked about his penis.

 

[Inthedetails]

This video deserves a description, out of consideration for the great discussion (mostly) on this thread, imo.

The video has an off-camera voice asking JE about a description of his penis. JE takes off his mic and walks off camera.

If that holds your interest, you can spend a minute watching the video.

jmo

ETA: In case it's not obvious, the video is not MSM. I'm sure people realize what is going on, but just in case.

 

[firebird]

This video deserves a description, out of consideration for the great discussion (mostly) on this thread, imo.

The video has an off-camera voice asking JE about a description of his penis. JE takes off his mic and walks off camera.

If that holds your interest, you can spend a minute watching the video.

jmo

ETA: In case it's not obvious, the video is not MSM. I'm sure people realize what is going on, but just in case.

It's an excerpt from a videotaped deposition, if that helps others who do or don't want to watch.

 

[Inthedetails]

It's an excerpt from a videotaped deposition, if that helps others who do or don't want to watch.

Are we sure that was the actual question asked? It's not MSM and the voice is off camera. Voice could be spliced in to make it sound like that. The GM photo was faked and there is nothing about this video that convinces me the audio of the question-asker is real.

But, oh boy it is funny to talk about penises...to 10yo boys on the playground.

jmo

 

[enelram]

There are also reports from the girls he abused that his genitalia were abnormal, oddly formed and not of normal appearance......

Wouldn't surprise me if he had artificially enhanced the size, shape and ability of his parts.
There are doctors in NYC who do nothing but this specialty.

 

[firebird]

Are we sure that was the actual question asked? It's not MSM and the voice is off camera. Voice could be spliced in to make it sound like that. The GM photo was faked and there is nothing about this video that convinces me the audio of the question-asker is real.

But, oh boy it is funny to talk about penises...to 10yo boys on the playground.

jmo

Here's what I see and hear. The witness is sworn. The voice off camera would be the questioning attorney and Epstein's attorney objecting to the question about the shape of his penis. In response the questioning attorney restates his question by referencing the document he took the "description" from. He's trying to fix the objection. The background is exactly what you'd expect in a videotaped deposition. All in all, it appears very authentic to me. But if it's not allowed here, it's not.

adding: both attorneys would always appear off camera at a videotaped deposition.

 

[Inthedetails]

Here's what I see and hear. The witness is sworn. The voice off camera would be the questioning attorney and Epstein's attorney objecting to the question about the shape of his penis. In response the questioning attorney restates his question by referencing the document he took the "description" from. He's trying to fix the objection. The background is exactly what you'd expect in a videotaped deposition. All in all, it appears very authentic to me. But if it's not allowed here, it's not.

adding: both attorneys would always appear off camera at a videotaped deposition.

I will believe an MSM source over a youtuber with 37 followers. Anyone have an MSM source for this deposition? The video had to have come from somewhere - would be nice to see if the video matches the audio from the original source.

jmo

 

[Tippy Lynn]

Here's what I see and hear. The witness is sworn. The voice off camera would be the questioning attorney and Epstein's attorney objecting to the question about the shape of his penis. In response the questioning attorney restates his question by referencing the document he took the "description" from. He's trying to fix the objection. The background is exactly what you'd expect in a videotaped deposition. All in all, it appears very authentic to me. But if it's not allowed here, it's not.

adding: both attorneys would always appear off camera at a videotaped deposition.

All jokes aside, what would the point be in asking such a question during a deposition? I realize it was most likely a deposition for a sex crime, but seriously why would it matter one way or another? Would they actually look at it or have a physician verify his anatomy?

 

[firebird]

Here's an MSM source for the "egg-shaped" depo:

blob:https://assets.scrippsdigital.com/ca697a41-cfa8-454c-83fc-dfefd4e7e6e4

It's found at this link from WPTV

Video archives: Jeffrey Epstein coverage from 2007-2009

I think the first link doesn't work, but if you go to the second link and scroll down, you'll see the video under the description "September, 2009: Jeffrey Epstein is deposed by one of his accuser's lawyers. He walks out when he is asked about his "egg-shaped penis.""

 

[Inthedetails]

Here's an MSM source for the "egg-shaped" depo:

blob:https://assets.scrippsdigital.com/ca697a41-cfa8-454c-83fc-dfefd4e7e6e4

It's found at this link from WPTV

Video archives: Jeffrey Epstein coverage from 2007-2009

Yes, MSM is much appreciated. Thank you for restoring us to WS standards.

And with that...I'm totally leaving this discussion of anatomy alone. Not pertinent to my interest in the case, so I'll catch up later.

jmo

 

[sloane7777]

All jokes aside, what would the point be in asking such a question during a deposition? I realize it was most likely a deposition for a sex crime, but seriously why would it matter one way or another? Would they actually look at it or have a physician verify his anatomy?

for ID purposes ? to prove the parties weren't making it up possibily?

 

[Tippy Lynn]

for ID purposes ? to prove the parties weren't making it up possibily?

Right, but I would think it would subjective unless there was a significant difference.
jmo

 

[Elley Mae]

September, 2009: Jeffrey Epstein is deposed by one of his accuser's lawyers. He walks out when he is asked about his "egg-shaped penis."

Video archives: Jeffrey Epstein coverage from 2007-2009

 

[Elley Mae]

The Palm Beach sex offender walked out of a recent deposition -- 100 seconds after it started -- when things got really personal, really fast, reports page2live.com.

And it was all caught on video.

Local attorney Spencer Kuvin asked the first question: ?What is your name??

Then came the second: ?Is it true that . . . you have an egg-shaped penis??

After an objection from his attorney, Mike Pike, and another attempt from Kuvin, Epstein took off his microphone and left.

SEE THE VIDEO: PALM BEACH SEX OFFENDER JEFFREY EPSTEIN WON'T TALK PRIVATE PARTS. IT'S TOO PRIVATE

 

[Elley Mae]

for ID purposes ? to prove the parties weren't making it up possibily?

Like michael jackson.

 

[sloane7777]

Like michael jackson.

I hate to ask but, did that happen ?

 

[Elley Mae]

I hate to ask but, did that happen ?

MICHAEL Jackson’s first public accuser identified distinctive “splotches” on the singer’s bum and penis which led to a $23million payoff, according to reports.

Jacko's penis was covered in ‘marks that were described by sex accuser’

 

[Jessthinkin]

All jokes aside, what would the point be in asking such a question during a deposition? I realize it was most likely a deposition for a sex crime, but seriously why would it matter one way or another? Would they actually look at it or have a physician verify his anatomy?

When MJ (the gloved wonder of singing fame) was under investigation for similar SA against minors, IIRC he was asked about some distinguishing marks in his genital area. If minor children were able to accurately describe such marks/features, it lends credence to the SA charges, IMO.

 

[gregjrichards]

The press here in the U.K is not giving up on Prince Andrew sky news has been playing the images and video of him at Epstein’s house from 2010 all day long and he is still in the newspapers. I just wonder if it is going to get worse for him.