NY - Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein arrested, sex trafficking, 6 July 2019 *FOUND DECEASED IN JAIL* #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #141
Ms Roberts Giuffre, now 36, claims Epstein’s lawyer Alan Dershowitz sexually abused her while she was under Epstein’s control, an allegation he vehemently denies

“It’s a horrible feeling to know that a woman, who is a liar, can destroy my life by just making up a story and people believe it.”
NoCookies | The Australian

This is what Virginia Roberts should reply

"It's a horrible CRIME to know that a MAN, who is a liar, has destroyed my life by DENYING the FACTS and people believe it"

There, I fixed it for you, Mr. Dershowitz
 
  • #142
I agree, but I also think Dershowitz was in tighter than others, more of a regular that just an amusement or pawn.

jmo
Epstein needed Dershowitz's legal argument to drop the age of consent for sex so that Epstein could access even younger vulnerable female children for sex.

THIS was paramout to Epstein. THIS is what he wanted. He didn't want more beautiful and charming women, more money, more cultured friends. He didn't even deny that he was having sex with young women, just that they were above the age of consent so it was "legal" and as such they were acting as "prostitutes".

He wanted sex with totally vulnerable virginal young girls. THIS is the CRIME. THIS is what he wanted to normalize. Very much like NAMBLA.

I'm shocked he didn't have a large estate in Thailand or Cambodia, maybe even Indonesia
 
  • #143
His current position on the topic, from the article. It would be very interesting to see whether Dersh is featured in any of the pics or recordings.

From the link:

Dershowitz stands by his argument today, tweeting earlier this week that “if a 16 year old has the constitutional right to have an abortion without state or parental interference, how could she not have the constitutional right to engage in consensual sex?”
Dear Dershowitz, no teenage girl would consent to have sex with you. She was not with you because she wanted to be. You're old, ugly, and sound like a jerk - not at all attractive to a teenager who wants to have sex for her own satisfaction. She was there because she was lured and manipulated by adults who knew perfectly well that they were luring and manipulating. She was not there on equal grounds.

my opinion

jmo
 
  • #144
I
Dear Dershowitz, no teenage girl would consent to have sex with you. She was not with you because she wanted to be. You're old, ugly, and sound like a jerk - not at all attractive to a teenager who wants to have sex for her own satisfaction. She was there because she was lured and manipulated by adults who knew perfectly well that they were luring and manipulating. She was not there on equal grounds.

my opinion

jmo

While what you said is certainly true, I think he was speaking generally there about the inconsistency between the consent laws on sex v. abortion. His statement is as much an argument for increasing the age of consent for abortion as it is for decreasing the age of consent for sex. IOW, an argument that they should be consistent.
 
  • #145
I


While what you said is certainly true, I think he was speaking generally there about the inconsistency between the consent laws on sex v. abortion. His statement is as much an argument for increasing the age of consent for abortion as it is for decreasing the age of consent for sex. IOW, an argument that they should be consistent.

Epstein just seized on this argument as a means to favor his intent.
 
  • #146
Peering out from behind the 15ft-high solid oak door Prince Andrew is seen to catch himself and check if anyone is watching as he waves goodbye to an attractive brunette.

A video of the encounter emerged as the Duke of York faced a growing list of questions over this association with the financier who died in prison in an apparent suicide earlier this month.

The Duke is seen in the video emerging in the imposing doorway of the New York building which Epstein’s victims have dubbed the “House of Horrors” to chat for a few seconds and then wave goodbye to an unnamed woman.

Before he closes the door he peers around it apparently to see if anyone is watching.

Witnesses told the Mail on Sunday that the woman entering and leaving the house whilst the Duke was inside “looked very young indeed”.

The footage is from December 2010 when the Duke, then the UKs Special Representative for Trade, stayed with Epstein in his New York home.

Previously pictures have emerged from the same trip of the pair walking together in Central Park.
Duke of York pictured inside mansion of convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein
 
  • #147
Epstein just seized on this argument as a means to favor his intent.

That may be the case, but too bad he has a fair point.
 
  • #148
I


While what you said is certainly true, I think he was speaking generally there about the inconsistency between the consent laws on sex v. abortion. His statement is as much an argument for increasing the age of consent for abortion as it is for decreasing the age of consent for sex. IOW, an argument that they should be consistent.
I know his point, but I don't agree with it (and I'm staying away from the abortion topic too).

jmo
 
  • #149
On Friday, the Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office, which runs the jail and stockade, handed out the records of his stay, during which he was allowed to leave the stockade in a chauffeur-driven car and deposited at a downtown West Palm Beach office building for a 12-hour-a-day, six-day-a-week respite from incarceration.

The records came out too late Friday to get a comment from Sheriff Ric Bradshaw or his spokeswoman. Bradshaw has faced increasingly fierce criticism — and his department is now under investigation by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement — for its seemingly soft treatment of the multimillionaire hedge fund manager, who was, according to the records, allowed to wander in and out of his unlocked cell at will.

That investigation is separate from the Justice Department probe looking at why then-federal prosecutor Alexander Acosta decided to shelve a 53-page sex trafficking indictment against Epstein, which could have put him away for life.

And now there is yet another pending investigation, this one looking at how Epstein, rearrested at 66 in early July on renewed sex trafficking charges, was able to hang himself last Saturday in a New York City jail cell while awaiting trial. The new charges were filed after the Miami Herald published a series on Epstein’s 10-year-old case, Perversion of Justice, that examined, among other things, Acosta’s decision to give in to a defense demand that victims not be told about the earlier federal charges being dropped.

The Manhattan cell where he took his own life — in a hardscrabble lockup notorious for bugs, rodents and rough jailmates — was a stark contrast to his surroundings in Palm Beach County in 2008.
Why was Jeffrey Epstein allowed to purchase small women’s panties from the Palm Beach jail?
 
  • #150
The Daily Mail seems to have proven that the Ghislaine Maxwell photos were photoshopped:
upload_2019-8-18_12-57-6.jpeg

They write, “Ghislaine Maxwell was snapped for the first time in three years last week, it was claimed a fellow diner had ‘chanced’ upon her at a Los Angeles burger bar.

However -“… an advertising agency claimed a poster on a bus shelter behind Ms Maxwell had been photoshopped in.

“The socialite is seen in front of a poster for Good Boys, a film that opened in the US on Friday.

“But when The Mail on Sunday visited the area on Friday, the bus stop was displaying an advert for a local hospital.

“Advertising agency Outfront Media said the hospital ad had been there since July 28 – with Ms Maxwell said to have been photographed on August 12.

“Spokeswoman Carly Zipp said: ‘We think the poster in the Maxwell picture was photoshopped in.

“We checked… and we have no evidence or record of Good Boys ever being there….

“Others question why Ms Maxwell, who appears to have restyled her hair between snaps, spent long enough at the burger bar for the customers behind her to change twice, yet her food remains untouched and she never puts a straw in either drink.

“One suggestion is the pictures were staged to throw people off her scent. A legal source said: ‘The FBI want to talk to her and a lot of lawyers are trying to find her. Perhaps this whole photo at the burger joint is set up.'”
Daily Mail Discovers Ghislaine Maxwell Burger Joint Pics Photoshopped – That’s Not What the NY Post Claims!
 
Last edited:
  • #151
The Daily Mail seems to have proven that the Ghislaine Maxwell photos were photoshopped:
View attachment 199030

They write, “Ghislaine Maxwell was snapped for the first time in three years last week, it was claimed a fellow diner had ‘chanced’ upon her at a Los Angeles burger bar.

However -“… an advertising agency claimed a poster on a bus shelter behind Ms Maxwell had been photoshopped in.

“The socialite is seen in front of a poster for Good Boys, a film that opened in the US on Friday.

“But when The Mail on Sunday visited the area on Friday, the bus stop was displaying an advert for a local hospital.

“Advertising agency Outfront Media said the hospital ad had been there since July 28 – with Ms Maxwell said to have been photographed on August 12.

“Spokeswoman Carly Zipp said: ‘We think the poster in the Maxwell picture was photoshopped in.

“We checked… and we have no evidence or record of Good Boys ever being there….

“Others question why Ms Maxwell, who appears to have restyled her hair between snaps, spent long enough at the burger bar for the customers behind her to change twice, yet her food remains untouched and she never puts a straw in either drink.

“One suggestion is the pictures were staged to throw people off her scent. A legal source said: ‘The FBI want to talk to her and a lot of lawyers are trying to find her. Perhaps this whole photo at the burger joint is set up.'”
Daily Mail Discovers Ghislaine Maxwell Burger Joint Pics Photoshopped – That’s Not What the NY Post Claims!
Kinda weird it took this long to figure out a photoshop job.

Just saying.

This is fishy. Game playing by GM? By NYPost, owned by company founded by her father's rival, if I have that detail right)?

Nothing is at face value in this case. It's all a joke, cover-up, deception, manipulation.

jmo
 
  • #152
Video from eight years ago:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #153
Video from eight years ago:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
The prince brings in business....and that says it all.

As long as big business isn't affected, nothing will change. As as long as businessmen (and I guess women too, as we've seen in this case) are okay with this behavior, any scandals will simply be a cost of doing business, with the knowledge the scandals will blow over.

I hope the days of that attitude are ending, but I'm not confident about it.

jmo
 
  • #154
The prince brings in business....and that says it all.

As long as big business isn't affected, nothing will change. As as long as businessmen (and I guess women too, as we've seen in this case) are okay with this behavior, any scandals will simply be a cost of doing business, with the knowledge the scandals will blow over.

I hope the days of that attitude are ending, but I'm not confident about it.

jmo
That tape really played down his contact with Epstein, implying it was only that stroll in the park that was photographed.

It didn't mention that he spent 4 nights in Epstein's home in Manhattan and that there were parties that went on. It also doesn't mention anything about the time Prince Andrew spent at Epstein's ranch in New Mexico nor on his island(s) in the Virgin Islands.

Lots and lots of denial.
 
  • #155
Bolded by me part....haven't heard of a sexual assault thus far that required going to the hospital.?!

"Jeffrey Epstein’s gal pal Ghislaine Maxwell donated $1,000 to New York-Presbyterian Hospital after the two of them allegedly brought one of his accusers there for treatment following a sexual assault, according to a British news report.

Maxwell also gave $350 to a New York City charity that aids victims of child sex trafficking at the same time Epstein was negotiating a controversial plea deal in Florida amid allegations he abused underage girls, the Telegraph said."

https://nypost.com/2019/08/18/epste...spital-that-treated-alleged-sex-slave-report/

(Snide remark....cheap donations/hush money, imo. Would expect bigger figures.)

jmo
 
  • #156
Bolded by me part....haven't heard of a sexual assault thus far that required going to the hospital.?!

"Jeffrey Epstein’s gal pal Ghislaine Maxwell donated $1,000 to New York-Presbyterian Hospital after the two of them allegedly brought one of his accusers there for treatment following a sexual assault, according to a British news report.

Maxwell also gave $350 to a New York City charity that aids victims of child sex trafficking at the same time Epstein was negotiating a controversial plea deal in Florida amid allegations he abused underage girls, the Telegraph said."

https://nypost.com/2019/08/18/epste...spital-that-treated-alleged-sex-slave-report/

(Snide remark....cheap donations/hush money, imo. Would expect bigger figures.)

jmo
Yes. Very Important Point

Of course, if the victim does not want to press charges against the perpetrator of the sexual assault she won't be named. It could very well be she was paid off by Epstein & Ghilaine.

And, as she is undoubtedly a minor, her medical records will be scrupulously off limits.

He really knew how to pick and how to manipulate his victims.
 
  • #157
There is a lot to be gleaned checking out GM and her family/connections. I attempted this threads ago. My Maxwell family post was deleted. Apologies mods. My bad, did not know it was not allowed.

IMO she is key to the sexual/trafficking part of his "empire". The schmo, JE, trying to recruit on school yards would be pathetic. As we all know, he is a genius, and would be targeted as a weirdo /predator doing this for himself. Plus he couldn't. Beneath him. JR culling for young girls would be noticed immediately.

He loathes women. The Entitled, (once) Rich, Female, Ghislaine is more curious to me, as a woman. Her Balls to the wall, active, longterm partner in sex trafficking of young, underage girls is way more disturbing than the motive of pathetic, common pervert JE. I get his dysfunction. Not hers.

To me, Ghislaine's dysfunction is more dark and disturbing.
It’s all very basic. He wanted sex. She wanted money. She found people for him to have sex with, and he gave her money, and they were both content with that arrangement.
 
  • #158
Yes. Very Important Point

Of course, if the victim does not want to press charges against the perpetrator of the sexual assault she won't be named. It could very well be she was paid off by Epstein & Ghilaine.

And, as she is undoubtedly a minor, her medical records will be scrupulously off limits.

He really knew how to pick and how to manipulate his victims.
More from the link about the hospital visit:

"The New York-Presbyterian donation was made on May 2, 2007, about six years after Virginia Giuffre has claimed that Maxwell and Epstein took her to the Upper East Side hospital following abuse inflicted by Epstein, the Telegraph said."

https://nypost.com/2019/08/18/epste...spital-that-treated-alleged-sex-slave-report/
 
  • #159
It’s all very basic. He wanted sex. She wanted money. She found people for him to have sex with, and he gave her money, and they were both content with that arrangement.
I don't disagree with that at all - I think that is what happened, but I think more was going on between them than procuring teenagers for sex. There were entanglements beyond just the girls, imo. The network of powerful people was more than just about sex partners, imo. He wanted sex, but he also wanted her connections. She wanted money, but she also wanted entanglements with the powerful that he could help arrange. I don't know what was going on, but sex was only part of it, imo.

jmo
 
  • #160
More from the link about the hospital visit:

"The New York-Presbyterian donation was made on May 2, 2007, about six years after Virginia Giuffre has claimed that Maxwell and Epstein took her to the Upper East Side hospital following abuse inflicted by Epstein, the Telegraph said."

https://nypost.com/2019/08/18/epste...spital-that-treated-alleged-sex-slave-report/
And did New York=Presbyterian report a sexual assault or any kind of child abuse to the authorities as required by law?

What happened there?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
2,504
Total visitors
2,592

Forum statistics

Threads
632,711
Messages
18,630,817
Members
243,269
Latest member
Silent_Observer
Back
Top