- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 23,290
- Reaction score
- 124,073
I hope Murdoch counter-sues. Trump shouldn’t be allowed to abuse our legal system and intimidate innocent people with these nuisance lawsuits.He's suing Murdoch? Wow.
jmo
I hope Murdoch counter-sues. Trump shouldn’t be allowed to abuse our legal system and intimidate innocent people with these nuisance lawsuits.He's suing Murdoch? Wow.
jmo
And now, we see all these missing pieces. Never to be assembled again, most likely.Five things you probably didn't know about Epstein's plea deal.
We have a government that actively promotes lies and seeks to suppress inconvenient truth comprehensively - employing all the authoritarian tools.With so much lying going on it's hard to know what to believe.
Do you believe the U.S. Justice Department and FBI's findings about Epstein's death will change public opinion?
If we don't believe the DOJ or FBI then all we're left with are conspiracies and some of those might be lies.
So what's the answer and how do the Epstein victims get justice?
Seems like it's more than sex trafficking (though that, of course, is a horrible offense). I don't think the amount of money that's been transferred and the amount of protection of names is because of sex with teens. (Again, this is not to diminish the serious offensive of SA.)We have a government that actively promotes lies and seeks to suppress inconvenient truth comprehensively - employing all the authoritarian tools.
The truth about sex trafficking is in the files. I say, let's see them: all of them, with the names and faces of the victims blocked. That shouldn't be so hard.
Who is the administration protecting? Bill Clinton? Prince Andrew? I say, charge them if the evidence is there. But let us see the evidence so we know it's not a "witch hunt".
I can't wait for Murdoch to start sending subpoenas and demanding documents. Murdoch may end up as the hero who got ALL the Epstein files, and deposed all the Epstein clients. His right to discovery in a civil proceeding is very broad. It is not limited to relevant and admissible evidence in the case.I hope Murdoch counter-sues. Trump shouldn’t be allowed to abuse our legal system and intimidate innocent people with these nuisance lawsuits.
And Murdoch owns the NYPost, which he can (and does) use to whip up right-wing opinion on how to handle the Epstein files.I can't wait for Murdoch to start sending subpoenas and demanding documents. Murdoch may end up as the hero who got ALL the Epstein files, and deposed all the Epstein clients. His right to discovery in a civil proceeding is very broad. It is not limited to relevant and admissible evidence in the case.
And he has the resources to fight until TRUMP says, "uncle".
I’m glad to see one of my Oregon senators pursuing this with Pam Bondi. Unfortunately, since the DOJ is no longer independent, I expect she’ll ignore this letter if Trump tells her to…and he most likely will.What's that old saying? Follow the money? This is an interesting list of where to "follow the money."
![]()
The United States Senate Committee on Finance
As Trump Sits on Key Epstein Files, Wyden Lays Out “Follow the Money” Investigation for DOJwww.finance.senate.gov
Agree, but it's now officially requested as I understand it. That might be best "transparency" we get - to know what was brought up and what was ignored.I’m glad to see one of my Oregon senators pursuing this with Pam Bondi. Unfortunately, since the DOJ is no longer independent, I expect she’ll ignore this letter if Trump tells her to…and he most likely will.
JMO