Sudzi and Jannucut: Sudzi--I'm curious about something you said. When you keep saying that "blood evidence in the jeep" should be all they need; whose blood are you referring to? If its only the parents blood and not Chris's, then won't Kindlon say that while his client slept, someone had to have stolen his jeep and committed the crime because Chris slept all night and would have never done this. If people saw the jeep, but didn't actually see Chris, can't Kindlon say the same thing(that Chris slept and the jeep had to be stolen); and even if toll records, gas receipt and eye witnesses saw the jeep he can say this. Thats why if the blood isn't Chris's and his Mom can't remember anything; then the case might be strong, but not a slam dunk...yet, so no arrest. Now as to this Maryland man, if the evidence against Porco is strong, but only circumstantial; then Kindlons best shot to win might be to show the jury, that the police ignored leads or made other errors. Thats why Kindlon and other defense attorneys constantly attack the police. Blame the cops and get your client off. Cops gotta be perfect and thats what I meant by "leave no stone unturned". So the police have got to show the jury, that every possible lead and possible suspect was checked out, but that only Chris Porco could have committed the crime. Thats why eliminating every other possible suspect makes the case against Chris Porco, that much stronger. I think the Maryland lead is simply part of the elimination of other possible suspects. Thats why I doubt the guy in Maryland has any connection to the crime, I'd guess he's simply a longshot idea that has to be checked out and eliminated to show the jury all leads were investigated I agree the cops need to show restraint, but they're under a lot of pressure to move faster and might have many more witnesses to investigate. They can't have this guy in Maryland wasting valuable time. The guy in Maryland's not returning the police's call--Don't most people return calls, when its from the cops? Lets hope somethingbreaksthis weekSudzi said:I'm with you on that Jannuncutt, I can understand LE wanting to give Christopher the impression that they have something on him. I can see why they would use the GPS information to tell his girl he was visiting another woman, (just in case she was holding anything back~that could have pushed her to tell them) I agree they should use all the tools at hand to try and find out who's responsible for this crime.
But if they had evidence on Christopher, especially blood evidence from his Jeep then why would they get the Maryland guy thing going, including that call to his parents.
I agree is seems a desperate attempt, and your right, it was a nasty phone message.
I don't think they have much to go on except circumstance and un-comfirmable hearsay.