GUILTY NY - Ex-President Donald Trump, charged with 34 criminal counts of falsifying business records, Apr 2023, Trial 25 Mar 2024 #4

[Izzylizzy]

Michael Cohen, key witness against Trump, testifies at trial about "hush money" payments

On the stand, Michael Cohen told jurors about the decade he spent working for Trump as his self-described "fixer" and attorney.

www.cbsnews.com

Michael, besides Stormy, may have been the most anticipated witness but as far as bringing in a 34 guilty count by the jury that verdict belongs to David Pecker from the National Enquirer.

 

[Love Never Fails]

I encourage anyone keeping up with this to go to YouTube and watch the full interview between Dr Phil and President Trump. The law matters.

 

[Izzylizzy]

I encourage anyone keeping up with this to go to YouTube and watch the full interview between Dr Phil and President Trump. The law matters.

Indeed it does which is why Trump was convicted of 34 felonies by a jury of 12.

 

[tlcya]

I encourage anyone keeping up with this to go to YouTube and watch the full interview between Dr Phil and President Trump. The law matters.

thank you, I watched the first five minutes and had to check out. Dr. Phil's pandering was a little more than I could bear.

 

[musicaljoke]

I don't believe that the documents were mislabeled. JMO.

Oh, I see. So are you saying that Cohen hadn't lied after all? Why then would he ever plead guilty and go to prison?

I can't see how it is possible to accept that the cheques were for anything other than paying the bush money. There is such a strong paper trail, recorded conversations, ...etc.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Oh, I see. So are you saying that Cohen hadn't lied after all? Why then would he ever plead guilty and go to prison?

I can't see how it is possible to accept that the cheques were for anything other than paying the bush money. There is such a strong paper trail, recorded conversations, ...etc.

No I'm not saying that.

 

[BayouBelle_LA]

In a brief letter sent Friday, New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan informed attorneys for former President Donald Trump about a potentially problematic Facebook comment made by someone who claimed to be a cousin of one of the jurors in his hush money trial.
(…)

“My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted. Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!!” the comment read, per the judge’s letter.

Judge In Trump Hush Money Case Sends Cryptic Letter About Facebook Comment

It is not clear whether the comment indicates one of the jurors defied the judge. Its author claims to be a "professional s**t poster."

www.huffpost.com

 

[SouthAussie]

In a brief letter sent Friday, New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan informed attorneys for former President Donald Trump about a potentially problematic Facebook comment made by someone who claimed to be a cousin of one of the jurors in his hush money trial.
(…)

“My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted. Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!!” the comment read, per the judge’s letter.

Judge In Trump Hush Money Case Sends Cryptic Letter About Facebook Comment

It is not clear whether the comment indicates one of the jurors defied the judge. Its author claims to be a "professional s**t poster."

www.huffpost.com

I guess it will all be sorted out when they determine if this person is actually the cousin of a jury member.


"The commenter’s profile claims he is a “professional s h * t poster.”
In a Friday post seemingly addressing the attention he suddenly received, the commenter wrote, “Take it easy… I’m a professional sh*tposter,” with a laughing emoji."

Judge In Trump Hush Money Case Sends Cryptic Letter About Facebook Comment

It is not clear whether the comment indicates one of the jurors defied the judge. Its author claims to be a "professional s**t poster."

au.news.yahoo.com

 

[LaborDayRN]

In a brief letter sent Friday, New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan informed attorneys for former President Donald Trump about a potentially problematic Facebook comment made by someone who claimed to be a cousin of one of the jurors in his hush money trial.
(…)

“My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted. Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!!” the comment read, per the judge’s letter.

Judge In Trump Hush Money Case Sends Cryptic Letter About Facebook Comment

It is not clear whether the comment indicates one of the jurors defied the judge. Its author claims to be a "professional s**t poster."

www.huffpost.com

Sounds like someone just trying to stir the pot so to speak. The commenter’s profile claims he is a “professional sh** poster.” JMO

 

[Arkay]

Sounds like someone just trying to stir the pot so to speak. The commenter’s profile claims he is a “professional sh** poster.” JMO

This is SUCH an ignorant thing to do.

If this is really a cousin with insider knowledge, it may cause a mistrial.
Who would do this to their cousin? Wouldn’t the cousin be guilty of some infraction if he or she did communicate the verdict in advance?

If it’s just a scam, which it may well be given the poster’s self-description, then this person is tying up the courts and costing taxpayer’s money, just in the interest of making trouble. Or receiving clicks and attention.

JMO

 

[CrimeDawg123]

He's certainly enjoying showing how gullible the Internet is

https://twitter.com/x/status/1799207789698654521

 

[bestill]

Why would the Judge send letters to both prosecution and defense about this if the "s h itposter" isn't real? Surely there is some type of verification. Something is up.

 

[SouthAussie]

Why would the Judge send letters to both prosecution and defense about this if the "s h itposter" isn't real? Surely there is some type of verification. Something is up.

Because he is a good judge and he is trying hard to be upfront and fair about everything.
He learned about the sh*tposter, so he disclosed that information to the relevant parties.

Now the prosecutors and the defence lawyers can look into it, and see if there is a valid problem.

imo

 

[Elliot_Alderson]

@JerseyGirl what are your thoughts on this trial outcome?

 

[Inthedetails]

Sounds like someone just trying to stir the pot so to speak. The commenter’s profile claims he is a “professional sh** poster.” JMO

Doesn't matter. Half the country will believe him.

jmo

 

[branmuffin]

I think it proves that President Trump had no intent to falsify any documents. So not guilty. JMO

Opinions don't decide a verdict. Facts do. As the old saying goes: you are entitled to your own opinions but you're not entitled to your own facts.

As his own incarceration looms large Trump back pedals and now states he never said 'Lock her up'. And as a supporter you might take his comment as fact because you support him. But you can't alter the facts that there are numerous video clips of him saying the phrase over and over again and not only agreeing with the phrase he expanded on it by naming Clinton as the person who should be locked up. And the fans went wild.

He can say the most outrageous things and his fans eat it up like candy. It is both fascinating and unnerving that such a flawed individual (and by that I don't mean a person who's led a venal life but has had an epiphany and corrected his path) but a person who continues his venality by using his position to disembowel your rule of law, to enrich his own pockets at taxpayers expense, encourages violence to cement his position and treats people as disposable when they no longer support his criminality.

I will never understand it. It defies logic.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Opinions don't decide a verdict. Facts do. As the old saying goes: you are entitled to your own opinions but you're not entitled to your own facts.

As his own incarceration looms large Trump back pedals and now states he never said 'Lock her up'. And as a supporter you might take his comment as fact because you support him. But you can't alter the facts that there are numerous video clips of him saying the phrase over and over again and not only agreeing with the phrase he expanded on it by naming Clinton as the person who should be locked up. And the fans went wild.

He can say the most outrageous things and his fans eat it up like candy. It is both fascinating and unnerving that such a flawed individual (and by that I don't mean a person who's led a venal life but has had an epiphany and corrected his path) but a person who continues his venality by using his position to disembowel your rule of law, to enrich his own pockets at taxpayers expense, encourages violence to cement his position and treats people as disposable when they no longer support his criminality.

I will never understand it. It defies logic.

I sorry but I can't help you to understand what I find to be true.

And hatred does not help in ones understanding of the truth.

But I do respect your opinion about this case.

JMO.

 

[Inthedetails]

Opinions don't decide a verdict. Facts do. As the old saying goes: you are entitled to your own opinions but you're not entitled to your own facts.

As his own incarceration looms large Trump back pedals and now states he never said 'Lock her up'. And as a supporter you might take his comment as fact because you support him. But you can't alter the facts that there are numerous video clips of him saying the phrase over and over again and not only agreeing with the phrase he expanded on it by naming Clinton as the person who should be locked up. And the fans went wild.

He can say the most outrageous things and his fans eat it up like candy. It is both fascinating and unnerving that such a flawed individual (and by that I don't mean a person who's led a venal life but has had an epiphany and corrected his path) but a person who continues his venality by using his position to disembowel your rule of law, to enrich his own pockets at taxpayers expense, encourages violence to cement his position and treats people as disposable when they no longer support his criminality.

I will never understand it. It defies logic.

It's the party of alternate facts.

jmo

 

[Ontario Mom]

I encourage anyone keeping up with this to go to YouTube and watch the full interview between Dr Phil and President Trump. The law matters.

I can't stand either of them, can you provide the highlights?

 

[CrimeDawg123]

I can't stand either of them, can you provide the highlights?

Dr Phil schooled on law in CNN interview after speaking with Trump

Edits in Trump interview with Dr Phil questioned by eagle-eyed viewers

Dr Phil has been accused of pandering to Donald Trump during in an interview at the former president’s Mar-a-Lago home in Florida

www.the-independent.com