I don't think there is a problem with the age of consent.
VR was 17 with her first encounter with PA in London. The age of consent was 16yo. I read that she was paid $15,000.
The second encounter was in New York when she was 17 where the age of consent was 17yo and she was paid $400.
So why does her lawyer carry on about her being under 18yo? PA has never been charged with rape so it must have been consensual.
VR stayed with Epstein and Maxwell for four years if she suffered so much and even asked Maxwell to be her surrogate when she married and wanted to have a baby? VR's parents must have approved as she was with Epstein from the ages of 16-20yo and had the photo taken of herself with PA to show off to her mother.
In the UK I don't think it's as straightforward as that. Laws on Child Sexual Exploitation (inc. trafficking) class a child as under 18. Andrew could be guilty if it can just be shown he was involved in arranging VR's travel.
2 Human trafficking
(1)A person commits an offence if the person arranges or facilitates the travel of another person (“V”) with a view to V being exploited.
(2)It is irrelevant whether V consents to the travel (whether V is an adult or a child).
(3)A person may in particular arrange or facilitate V’s travel by recruiting V, transporting or transferring V, harbouring or receiving V, or transferring or exchanging control over V.
(4)A person arranges or facilitates V’s travel with a view to V being exploited only if—
(a)the person intends to exploit V (in any part of the world) during or after the travel, or
(b)the person knows or ought to know that another person is likely to exploit V (in any part of the world) during or after the travel.
(5)“Travel” means—
(a)arriving in, or entering, any country,
(b)departing from any country,
(c)travelling within any country.
(6)A person who is a UK national commits an offence under this section regardless of—
(a)where the arranging or facilitating takes place, or
(b)where the travel takes place.
(7)A person who is not a UK national commits an offence under this section if—
(a)any part of the arranging or facilitating takes place in the United Kingdom, or
(b)the travel consists of arrival in or entry into, departure from, or travel within, the United Kingdom.
Modern Slavery Act 2015
__________
It also blurs the lines on consent.
Consent in Child Sexual Exploitation cases
In cases involving the alleged grooming of vulnerable complainants such as youths, apparent consent to sexual activity may not amount to consent in law. In these circumstances determining whether to select; consensual or non-consensual offences may be complex.
[...]
In cases involving the alleged grooming of vulnerable complainants such as youths, apparent consent to sexual activity may not amount to consent in law. In these circumstances determining whether to select; consensual or non-consensual offences may be complex.
When reviewing cases of child sexual exploitation, prosecutors must consider:
- The age and maturity of the complainant especially in relation to the suspect;
- The history of the relationship between complainant and suspect;
- The presence of any other vulnerability of the complainant such as a learning disability;
- The existence of grooming through the provision of gifts, alcohol, insincere compliments, apparent security, a more exciting way of life, attention and false promises;
- The provision of alcohol and drugs and the effect on the complainant;
- The use and/or threat of violence and intimidation;
- The use of other means of control such as emotional or situation control.
Rape and Sexual Offences - Chapter 6: Consent | The Crown Prosecution Service
__________
I think the bolded ones could be applicable, from VR's complaint:
C. Defendant’s Sexual Abuse of Plaintiff
36.Prince Andrew abused Plaintiff on separate occasions when she was under the age of 18 years old.
37.On one occasion, Prince Andrew sexually abused Plaintiff in London at Maxwell’s home. During this encounter, Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew forced Plaintiff, a child, to have sexual intercourse with Prince Andrew against her will.
[...]
41.During each of the aforementioned incidents, Plaintiff was compelled by express or implied threats by Epstein, Maxwell, and/or Prince Andrew to engage in sexual acts with Prince Andrew, and feared death or physical injury to herself or another and other repercussions for disobeying Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew due to their powerful connections, wealth, and authority. Case 1:21-cv-06702 Document 1 Filed 08/09/21 Page 9 of 15
42.During each of the aforementioned incidents, Prince Andrew acted with intent to compel Plaintiff’s submission.
43.Prince Andrew engaged in each of the aforementioned sexual acts with Plaintiff at Epstein and Maxwell’s invitation, knowing that she was a sex-trafficking victim being forced to engage in sexual acts with him.
44.During each of the aforementioned incidents, Plaintiff did not consent to engaging in sexual acts with Prince Andrew.
45.During each of the aforementioned incidents, Prince Andrew knew Plaintiff’s age based on communications from Epstein and Maxwell. 46.During each of the aforementioned incidents, Prince Andrew sexually abused Plaintiff for the purpose of gratifying his sexual desires.
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Prince-Phillip-sexual-assault-lawsuit.pdf
__________
[Disclaimer: I'm not sure what the exact wording of the laws was back in 2000-2002, PA would definitely have a case to answer if it happened today.]