Anyone getting a read on the jury (that's in the courtroom)?
I think so far, clear and compelling motive has been proven. I was a bit disappointed that (when on stand) Jason wasn't asked about what he shared w/ us here -- that Remy had told Jen he wanted a divorce, but wanted to keep the house and kids. She'd have fought him for the kids, probably won, and then he'd have had to pay child support (and maybe also alimony?). He may have told Eileen that he'd have provided for Jen if they divorced, but just how far would his money go, if he was having to maintain two households? Weren't they already in financial arrears? I'm hoping testimony about their financial situation will be brought forward, so the jury can understand why Remy chose murder over divorce (esp. since Jen was seeking out an attorney, probably to protect her rights).
Plenty of testimony from family, friends and lover that he was a controlling, manipulative, obsessive jerk that was besotted w/ ES.
And now, evidence that he wasn't where he said he was on that fateful day.