Or lover.I don't wanna assume anything, but this could definitely be a spousal murder, as can be common with Jane Does.
Or lover.I don't wanna assume anything, but this could definitely be a spousal murder, as can be common with Jane Does.
I don't wanna assume anything, but this could definitely be a spousal murder, as can be common with Jane Does.
Now that we know she was married, I'd agree. Still think she spent time in an institution somewhere just prior to death, though. Thinking maybe she was hospitalized with post-partem depression (with or without possible abortion), but there were problems in the home after her release (financial, conjugal, etc) and husband couldn't deal with it. jmoI don't wanna assume anything, but this could definitely be a spousal murder, as can be common with Jane Does.
Absolutely. I also wonder whether this couple had any children. I had the sad thought, too, that maybe he wanted children and it wasn't going well, so he'd found another woman, and needed to dispose of our Jane Doe in order to be with her. Just a thought.It's an even better possibility if the husband didn't report her missing.
Sorry, I'm a bit confused. His lover or hers?Or lover.
I’m not saying she had one, to be clear. But hers.Sorry, I'm a bit confused. His lover or hers?
Gotcha. So hypothetically speaking, she had a lover who maybe wanted her to leave her husband, but she refused, so she was killed. Something like that?I’m not saying she had one, to be clear. But hers.
Trunks made like that have the potential to float. Under the black coating there's usually plywood or high density fiberboard. It would probably float, although be partially submerged. The closure area is usually 2 tightly fitted metal bands, along with with an interlock inside. I could imagine it staying watertight for a time, and floating.
The killer probably thought it would sink because of the weight.
So the trunk was either intercepted before it could sink, or someone changed their mind about sinking it.
RSBMAs for the labeled clothing - it was not uncommon, especially in cities with people living in apartment buildings, that there was one washer for the whole building shared by all tenants. Actually it is still the case in many apartment buildings. To avoid having laundry mixed up, clothing gets labeled.
It does not necessarily indicate institutionalization or sexwork.
Maybe so.This is likely a case of dad telling the kids „Oh, Mommy just left us for better pastures, no idea where she went…“
She may habe lost her shoes in the struggle. She may have been killed at home and not wearing shoes. And even if she wore them, her killer has no reason to put them in the trunk with her.RSBM
Thanks for sharing that. I wasn't aware of that practice.
Maybe so.
I might be over-thinking it, but the fact she was wearing pantyhose with no shoes still bothers me. That and the all black undergarments under a cream colored floral print dress. Just seems odd...
You are very smart!! I am going to edit my post if I can.Very nice finds. Via Google I see a Philip Bayne mentioned repeatedly as a Stamford, CT accountant who found the trunk. I think "Dayne" is a typo for Bayne.
Back atcha!You are very smart!! I am going to edit my post if I can.