- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Messages
- 3,395
- Reaction score
- 6,417
I agree - I was simply pointing out that - after reading an earlier post about potetntially sending out tranmissions - my thoughts were that it would not be a good move (and against WS policy ansd procedure of acceptable method) - since I had already covered it late last year -on my own, solo, before Sylvi'a case had been introduced to WS ( hence no WS reference or anything WS linked). I apologize if the post came across as - a promotion of an effort to attempt to pursue that course of action (as it was not). It's bifurcate purpose had been to share the type of reception received from the effort (a lot of thanks , but no thanks types of replies received from professors of that science) The post/statment penned above - my second goal had been to soley praise the brainsstorming, and pooling of thoughts, that's all. I hope I am making sense. ;-)
G - yes, makes sense to me. And your post last night came in the middle of a lot of re-writes of an effort to raise awareness and keep Sylvia on the radar.
So it was nothing you did, and our letter writing effort while well-intended here on WS, really can be created by anyone who knew Sylvia growing up, at school, etc..
I'll reiterate what I said in my reply to you last night before it was mod-vanished (because of the pdf)-- Thanks for your post!!
Rose ML