I'm sure LE was looking at every angle from day one. They have to look at all possibilities. If they hadn't and Bill was arrested, his defense would be they had tunnel vision and focused only on him. If this had been a young child that had gone missing, it would've been handled somewhat differently but because Cheryl was an adult they HAD to consider that she ran off. Regardless of anything Bill did or didn't say, Cheryl had filed for divorce, she was seeing another man and Bill was seeing another woman. People in those situations do run off. They had to get a warrant from a judge to search that house. They conducted the search as soon as the judge signed the warrant. Again if Cheryl had been a child, it would've been much easier to get the search warrant but because she was an adult who was fully capable of taking care of herself if she left to start a new life, LE had to show the judge how they had ruled out that likelihood. It takes time to do that.I was carrying on a conversation with a close friend of Cheryl on another site , when I mentioned why the delay in the beginning of the police waiting 7 days for the initial home search, it was indicated that he the suspect had somehow convinced the police she left on her own accord, she ran off, etc...the police bought into that excuse ......now because of that stupidity they lost 7 days of crucial evidence that could have been in the home, I did not think police agencies operated that way, since when do they put complete stock into the surviving spouse without a complete investigation,
Makes you wonder what academy award winning performance he portrayed to get them to believe his story in the beginning....
No wonder why we are at the crossroads of no evidence and nothing.....
You're entitled to your opinion but it gets tiresome when you clearly don't understand the process and steps involved in a missing adult investigation. You have bad mouthed LE constantly when you haven't the slightest idea of what they've been doing or what evidence they have uncovered.