OH - Christopher Lukacs Charged with raping 4 yr old daughter, 2008

[Filly]

He must be given this :behindbar forever! :furious::furious::furious:

And then some the nasty, perverted creep.

 

[Filly]

What's the holdup with this freaks trial? It was supposed to be July 8th. Hopefully he got a tumor the size of a watermelon and a fellow inmate kicked his s and maybe he was made to drink bleach and be someone's girlfriend while he was wating for his trial.

Wishful thinking.

 

[pixies]

What's the holdup with this freaks trial? It was supposed to be July 8th. Hopefully he got a tumor the size of a watermelon and a fellow inmate kicked his s and maybe he was made to drink bleach and be someone's girlfriend while he was wating for his trial.

Wishful thinking.

You made me smile! LOL
We can only wish.

 

[Salem]

What's the holdup with this freaks trial? It was supposed to be July 8th. Hopefully he got a tumor the size of a watermelon and a fellow inmate kicked his s and maybe he was made to drink bleach and be someone's girlfriend while he was wating for his trial.

Wishful thinking.

I'm wondering if he plead out and now there is not going to be a trial? That's a scary thought. The jury would do him damage, hopefully!

Salem

 

[Belinda]

2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 1956,*;2010 Ohio 2364

STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CHRISTOPHER LUKACS, Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL NOS. C-090309, C-090310

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, HAMILTON COUNTY

2010 Ohio 2364; 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 1956


May 28, 2010, Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal

snip

Defendant-appellant, Christopher Lukacs, appeals convictions for three counts of rape under R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b), one count of rape under R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), one count of felonious assault under R.C. 2903.11(A)(1), and one count of failure to verify his address under R.C. 2950.06. We find no merit in his thirteen assignments of error, and we affirm his convictions.

snip

X. Summary/Failure to Assess Costs

In sum, we overrule all thirteen of Lukacs's assignments of error. But we note that the trial court failed to address the mandatory issue of court costs at the sentencing hearing or in its judgment entry. n74 We, therefore, reverse the trial court's judgment only in the respect that it failed to address costs. We remand the case to the trial court to address that issue and to make the appropriate order in its judgment entry. We affirm the trial court's decision in all other respects.

https://www.lexisone.com/lx1/casela...=hZKY.WDab.cSIS.GaiX&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW

Christopher Lukacs

Location: Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Sentence Date: 04/24/2009

Offense: 3 counts of 1st Degree Rape
Sentence: 3 Life Sentences - Concurrent

Offense: 1 count 2nd Degree Felony Assault
Sentence: 25 years - Life - Consecutive

Projected Parole Date: Life

Ambre King

Sentence Date: 06/18/2009

Offense: Child Endangerment
Sentence: 5 years Probation

Note: Not positive, but my understanding is that the children have been permanently placed with the grandparents.

 

[believe09]

Thanks Belinda-there should be a permanent RO against mom...