Johnny B Bad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 27, 2018
- Messages
- 2,165
- Reaction score
- 11,846
Not all of the scrap, but there is a lot of it gone.Have they hauled all the trash and scrap metal away?
Not all of the scrap, but there is a lot of it gone.Have they hauled all the trash and scrap metal away?
A post was removed because it criticized JW's appearance and contained a statement that indicated prior drug use by JW. It was removed because WS does not condone criticizing physical appearance and to my knowledge there is no MSM to specifically indicate prior drug use by JW. Subsequent posts were then removed for speculating that the accused Wagners were possibly in a drug fueled rage when they allegedly killed the Rhodens and I am not aware of any MSM that supports such speculation of drug fueled rages by members of the family.
Please know that it is a violation of TOS (aka The Rules) to discuss moderation on the thread and can result in an automatic TO. If you want to challenge or take on a Mod or Admin for something you disagree with, do it respectfully through private message and discuss it in a civil fashion without attacking them sarcastically on a public thread.
Meticulously? plus they do a great job? plus salt of the earth people? (all per you)
and JBB spoke to a family member and the R's are taking good care of the grass?
WS has a place to sign up to verify insiders.
File it anyway you want to I was telling Cool Cat about me going to Pike County and what I was told from a resident.
Your welcome Cool Cat, I’m just trying to keep the thread going in between court dates, and it felt real good to talk with local people that did not speak bad about the Rhodens like Kathleen Hale wrote in her piece she did article right after the murders, the Rhodens Massacre was a bad thing and I hope that justice will be served!And I appreciate it. Thanks Johnny. Thanks for sharing...![]()
Correct. Every word the defendants say without initiation from someone else, can and will be used against them. And before this motion was detailed on April 4, Jake had already spilled his guts to someone. All just my opinion.
There hasn't been any updates on the court site for Rita - any news on her next hearing from articles? TIA!
Your welcomeThanks for sharing, Johnny.
Will it be retroactive or just from April 4 on? TIA
Thank you Cool Cats for info on Rita's trial date!![]()
Thanks Johnny B Bad.Not all of the scrap, but there is a lot of it gone.
Your welcome Cool Cat, I’m just trying to keep the thread going in between court dates, and it felt real good to talk with local people that did not speak bad about the Rhodens like Kathleen Hale wrote in her piece she did article right after the murders, the Rhodens Massacre was a bad thing and I hope that justice will be served!
You’re welcomeThanks Johnny B Bad.
Will it be retroactive or just from April 4 on? TIA
So do you think that JW or his brother GW4 will be subpoenaed to testify at their granny's trial? Can they be because they themselves face the same charges?CC, do you mean in Jake's indictment?
Her attorney better plea bargain, JMOSo do you think that JW or his brother GW4 will be subpoenaed to testify at their granny's trial? Can they be because they themselves face the same charges?
If JW and GW4 presented RN with the papers to be notarized already with HR's signature on them two things could be said. Either RN knew HR's signature was forged, so her lawyer would not want JW or GW4 to testify or RN could say my grandsons lied to me.
The first is knowingly forging documents then notarizing them and maybe even knowing why she was doing it...ie getting rid of HR.
The second is being duped by family and breaking the law by not seeing a person sign a document you're notarizing.
How does RN's lawyer defend his client without bringing her grandsons into it?