Interesting argument, but I still think Jake was planting false info in those early hours.
He assumed (correctly) that all he had to do was provide similar "tips" to LE to point them towards the Manleys.
How else did LE decide to pounce immediately on BJM and JM? How did they come up with the accusation that someone had "paid" the Manleys to kill their family members? Within an hour or two of discovering the bodies, LE already had a "plot" they were working with to question and accuse the Manleys. It was more than making up a few lies, it sounded much more like a fully formed theory, JMO.
It would also be very characteristic (and accurate) for the Wagners to assume that LE would always take their word against that of the Manleys and Rhodens. Wagners lived "close to the cross", were upstanding citizens and all.
Wagners knew they could become suspects because of the custody fight between Jake and Hanna. LE knew about the fight that had happened in the weeks before, Len talked about it on worldwide live news coverage. Yet, LE immediately jumped on the Manleys and stayed there for the better part of a year.
Wagners had to come up with something that would direct attention to the Manleys. They had been surveilling the victims, they knew BJM was going to water the plants at CR1's every morning. They knew BJM would be the first to find the bodies. All it took was planting digital evidence on the victims' social media accounts and calling in a few tips to LE with a ready-made story.
Charlie Reader mentioned "All the lies they told us". Those lies started that morning and they probably came from Jake, possibly Angela. Later they came from the rest of the family, including FW. The Wagner lies are still being told today.
JMO
Also found it interesting that, when BCI was finally searching the Peterson Rd. farm and the used car business, Leonard Manley still didn't think LE was going to solve the case. He probably knew it was the Wagners, he just didn't think LE would accept that without a lot of evidence.
The following weekend, not much had changed
It would make sense for them to plan a way to be on the offensive rather than defensive. Claiming they thought they knew whom did the crime keeps them from having to be questioned and proving they did not do it. It sounds more believable than being accused and then saying no it was someone else. It is not normal for the criminal to come forward and tell LE someone else was responsible. That would throw LE in a different direction before they had a chance to accuse the Wagners.
Last edited: