Thanks for your input, CC. I understand.
Recall, though, AC was very careful with her wording. She said the attorney was cherry picking his words while she was arguing to the judge that the attorney was not allowed to say those things in court. Judge Deering agreed and told him to stop it. He specifically chastised him for trying his case in the media.
In court, the only claims he managed to get out before Judge Deering and AC cut him off was his claim that Jake said GW4 didn't kill anyone. Therefore, some of the items you mention above from the PD article have been repeated to a news reporter in violation of the Judge's gag order. Truth be told, we don't know where some of that information comes from. Let's go over it (Bolded part is my response):
1.) George didn't shoot anybody. (This was the only claim GW4's attorney got out in court. AC says it was cherrypicked information from the beginning of Jake's confession interview)
2.) George went along on the murders at the last minute. (This was not in the last pre-trial hearing. No idea where this information is from)
3.) George went along to protect Jake from Billy. (This was not in the pre-trial hearing. No idea where this information comes from)
4.) George tried to talk the Wagners out of committing the murders. (This was not in the pre-trial hearing. No idea where this information comes from).
5.) George had no intent to commit murder. (This was not in the pre-trial hearing. No idea where this information comes from).
I'm not sure which is worse - the attorney violating the gag order or the PD reporter stating it all as fact without checking. To me, that indicates the PD reporter didn't even attend the pre-trial hearing, but instead wrote the article from a phone call, text or email from the attorney. JMO
Here's a link referencing Judge Deering placing a gag order on GW4's case
Rhoden family massacre: George Wagner IV pleads not guilty to 22 counts
As for the part about shoes, that wasn't mentioned in the pre-trial hearing
Here's a link to that pretrial hearing a month ago. The part referenced where AC argues and Judge Deering agrees starts around 13:33