OMG! Did we just hear George's name mentioned?Here it comes! Ears up!
Take a good look at the printout of the texts, look at texts not highlighted. "Don't text back here. Just text back to my phone, going outside"
OMG! Did we just hear George's name mentioned?Here it comes! Ears up!
Take a good look at the printout of the texts, look at texts not highlighted. "Don't text back here. Just text back to my phone, going outside"
Waiting for it......Finally, we have GW evidence
Agent stated this interview was on Sept 9 2016. I don't know if it's been said when the investigators received and started any wires taps, etc. but I'm assuming that on the day of this interview there were none in place yet. If so it would have been interesting to hear who BW called and what was said.
I listened to the whole rambling interview but still don't understand why this was presented today except to indicate how BCI conducted their interviews of anyone. But something put them on the trail of the Ws I must have missed any clue from this interview.
Yes! This is interesting because according to Billy he was blowing Chris's phone up. The defense was trying hard to suggest maybe Billy had a different phone you know because Chris Sr had 2 different phones.
They proved he had 2 phones in May of 2017, not April of 2016. The issue before was he didn't turn the phone over and he said it was destroyed, but he also said he was calling Chris, but no calls came in to Chris's phone after his death from Billy. How did Billy's destroy his phone because he was upset calling his best friend so many times, but there were no calls. If he called from some other phone then why destroy a different phone? His excuse for not having the phone in question was a lie.Prosecution just proved BW had two phones.
Doing their jobs.and a text message back and forth with BW, I am liking the defense challenging everything, what have they to lose, jury cannot consider defense attys conduct so they should make the state prove everything and only be allowed to use probative not overly prejudicial evidence
They proved he had 2 phones in May of 2017, not April of 2016. The issue before was he didn't turn the phone over and he said he was destroyed, but he also said he was calling Chris, but not calls came in to Chris's phone after his death from Billy. How did Billy's destroy his phone because he was upset calling his best friend so many times, but there were no calls. If he called from some other phone then why destroy a different phone? His excuse for not having the phone in question was a lie.
Yes! This is interesting because according to Billy he was blowing Chris's phone up. The defense was trying hard to suggest maybe Billy had a different phone you know because Chris Sr had 2 different phones.
Yup, it is a printed list showing George's name and a bunch of guns listed under it. Prosecution making progress.there you go - here's direct evidence including George
I will never understand why anybody needs as many guns as the Wagners or Rhodens have
It shows to me that BCI was no investigating the Wagners from day 1. The interview with Billy was nearly 5 months later. So defense trying to say they just focused in on the Wagners and didn't investigate anyone else would be false. BCI in this interview said they wanted to talk to him because they received tips about a fight. He cleared that up and said there wasn't one. But, he continued to ramble. I think most could listen to that one interview and raise an eyebrow at what was said. It shows they followed up on what Billy said and none of the suspects he threw out panned out, but things might have kept pointing right back to the Wagners.
How many cases have we seen the someone else did it theory and LE just picked someone and focused in and didn't check out anything else. This is laying groundwork I think that they didn't do that here and that they went down other paths that all lead back to the Wagners.
Yes, long ago I knew one intimately and it's amazing how some can fly below the radar and just carry on when others are snagged left and right.Have ya'll ever had a friend or known someone that was associated with things, but always seemed to be the good guy. Never really fully in, but not fully out and you get the feeling they are wishy washy or trying to portray they are one way, but they are behind the scenes involved in the shenanigan's?