- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 23,536
- Reaction score
- 172,311
Perhaps they want to use the tape to imply Jake also lied in his proffer.
Any murderer who was being questioned by LE is going to lie at first. Years later, if they decide to turn state's evidence, they're going to tell the truth and it will be different from what they said in previous interviews. If you're confessing, it's ok to admit you lied before when you were trying to hide your guilt.
But a defense attorney who is trying to get your partner off is going to try to make you look like you're lying all the time. That's what defense attorneys are paid to do, use any trick in the book to put killers back on the street.
Assume AC is saying the way GW4's defense is trying to impeach confession testimony isn't allowed in conspiracy cases, where one (or in this case 2) killers are confessing while testifying about their co-conspirators who haven't confessed. Manipulating an old interview to impeach the testimony of the conspirator who has confessed, on order to get off the conspirator who refuses to confess.
I'm going to read this part of the argument again later to figure out the conspiracy charge argument.