- Joined
- May 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,324
- Reaction score
- 7,706
GW4 wanted to download his day to BW, and BW wanted him to shut up about it and get off the phone. GW4 was concerned that BCI was still hanging around the border crossing.
LookS like JW was searching that other infamous website to see if posters were talking about him. IMOmoo
Defense will appeal based on the judge allowing them to play incriminating statements by their client. Moo
and moo lol
edit: That infamous website was mentioned again earlier.
Has a moderator declined us from speaking about Topix since it's been mentioned in court and elaborated on by Julia today explaining what Topix was about.moo
Defense will appeal based on the judge allowing them to play incriminating statements by their client. Moo
and moo lol
edit: That infamous website was mentioned again earlier.
I mean hard to appeal based on something you requested isn't it? I don't know it's just ridiculous to me that this is an issue now and not before this all started.
RE: that website mentioned earlier and again.. it's starting to sound like the W's were on that site.
It's always been a forbidden topic here. You could ask a Mod, though, if you think they should make an exception today.Has a moderator declined us from speaking about Topix since it's been mentioned in court and elaborated on by Julia today explaining what Topix was about.
It's always been a forbidden topic here. You could ask a Mod, though, if you think they should make an exception today.
When I was listening it seemed the defense thinks they were presented in a way that says that was the reason for each call to discuss what was played, but in fact other things were discussed in each call. So they want to play the entire call to show it wasn't just a call to discuss what the prosecution played.@jamespilcher
·
14m
defense arguing the prosecution is playing the recordings (excerpts) out of context.
@local12
Maybe because it was speculation if they were on there posting or not, but now that it's confirmed then maybe it can be discussed as it pertains to the trial?It's always been a forbidden topic here. You could ask a Mod, though, if you think they should make an exception today.
I thought they were talking about the 2018 tapes and R &L truckingOhh, did you hear that?
Sounded like Parker said the state wants introduce evidence from "the website, which is voluminous".
I'll have to wait until I can playback the video.
Looks like the judge is going to listen to about 40 minutes of audio now.
Here is the Alaska house AW and GW are discussing.