Related, but unrelated question.
Fredericka Wagner's charges were dismissed without prejudice so she can be charged again. Here is the entries in her court file that I wanted to comment on.
06/26/2019 | REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THE STATE'S MOTION TO LIMIT PRODUCTION OF GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS FILED |
06/26/2019 | MEMORANDUM CONTRA DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE SEARCH OF FREDERICKA WAGNER'S RESIDENCE ON MAY 13, 2017 FILED |
06/26/2019 | MEMORANDUM CONTRA DEFENDANT'S OMNIBUS MOTION REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF PRETRIAL DISCOVERY BY THE STATE OF OHIO FILED |
06/26/2019 | MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE FILED Attorney: ROBERT JUNK Attorney: CANEPA, ANGELA R |
06/26/2019 | JOURNAL ENTRY -- UPON MOTION OF THE STATE OF OHIO, THE COURT GRANTS AN ORDER OF PROTECTION AND DECORUM FOR THE WITHIN PROCEEDINGS; COUNSEL SHALL NOT MAKE ANY PUBLIC STATEMENTS REGARDING THIS MATTER UNLESS SAME ARE MADE ON THE COURT RECORD; COUNSEL SHALL NOT PROVIDE ANY STATEMENTS OR INFORMATION TO ANY SOURCE WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY INFLUENCE ANY PRETRIAL PUBLICITY IN THIS RESPECTIVE MATTER; THIS ORDER SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT AND SHALL SURVIVE THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ORDER FILED COPIES FILED RETD TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES |
06/26/2019 | DISMISSAL ENTRY -- UPON WRITTEN APPLICATION OF THE STATE OF OHIO, AND FOR REASONS STATED ON THE RECORD, THE STATE OF OHIO REQUESTED THAT THE ABOVE-NAMED CASE BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THIS ACTION BE, AND HEREBY IS, DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE FILED COPIES FILED RETD TO COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT |
So who thinks that prosecution dropped the charges till the trials are over. Maybe they didn't want to release documents about the search of FW property or some other evidence in this case so not to impact the trials of the big 4? Who thinks she will face charges once the other 4 are done and sentenced?