From the little bit I have caught up on the defense is doing a clever direct, they are going nowhere near the murders, the crime scenes, the planning, the state can only cross on what was revealed on direct, so in theory the judge should rule on all the defense objections to the state going into areas that were not touched upon in direct
in theory it should mean GW can't be asked to explain anything about the murders because he is not asked on direct, we shall see, sometimes differing states have different rules, but in many trials, I have watched the defense can only ask questions that relate to what the state elicited on direct, and the state can only get into what was discussed on defense direct
it may be different because of this being a conspiracy we shall see,
Life has got in the way, and I will not be able to watch live trials till Friday, so I hope he is still on stand then, and thanks for all the posts so I can at least have some good bedtime reading