ralyla
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2018
- Messages
- 380
- Reaction score
- 2,798
I know this is going go be an unpopular opinion but it's mine & I'll own it:
If I didn't know some of the things I think I know - things the jurors haven't been privy to...I think George's testimony was fairly convincing in a reasonable doubt kind of way. As of this moment, I think he did the right thing, taking the stand.
I might not think that way after his cross but if I was a juror, I probably wouldn't get much sleep tonight, I would be turning it all over & over in my mind all night. I'm NOT a juror and that's what I'll be doing.
I agree. I stumbled upon this case by chance on YouTube. I had never heard about it, listened to the podcasts, or looked any information up. I decided not to after watching the trial because I was curious to watch with no knowledge. I highly doubt GW4 did not, at minimum, know about the family plans, and I do believe he participated at some level. However, as someone with zero background on the family or murders outside of this trial, I think this was his best bet. I don't believe everything he says, but it was a decent effort at defending himself. We will see how the cross goes.