This is just my impression of George4.
On the plus side, he was very disciplined on the stand and for the most part, stuck to answers he thought were safe and reasonable. Of course he denied the murders.
But take, for example, his reasoning for not wanting/allowing TC to see their son--"because she wanted to bring her mother and her sister." That's so terribly controlling, considering that the visits would happen either under supervision or (perhaps) at a local place like a McDonald's where the boy would be nowhere near someone with a history of molestation. I truly do not believe the story about TC's mother "holding her down." TC was very clear that she did not want BW anywhere near her molester. There is no reason to keep a mother, grandmother and aunt away from short supervised or nearby public visits with the mother's child. Zero, none. G4 was violating the custody agreement which required reasonable access to the child. And yes, I know this case is riddled with victims of sexual abuse, but there is no reason to perpetrate that abuse by denying victims access to their children. TC and Hanna and Beth had done nothing wrong to suggest they were molesters or enablers of that behavior. Period. This litany of victim blaming is highly offensive. Edited to add: Given his contempt for TC's mother and sisters, and considering Jake's reasons for murdering Hanna's family, TC was right to fear for her life. There are a lot of dots to connect here.
And it was gobsmacking that he "didn't have anyone but Angela" to leave his son with when the son has a mother, after all the terrible things he said about her. And that he thought HE should be raising Sophia instead of Jake, especially when his testimony is that he was rarely home, only got about an hour of sleep at night (driving big rigs, very safe) and spent most of his time when not working poaching deer with illegal gear.
Yeah, he likes to kill things when he has an advantage. There is no way a man this angry and arrogant would have missed all that prep for the murders. No way. And all those deer head trophies on the wall. Makes it so believable that the tattoo isn't the only kind of "trophy" he could take away from the slaughter of 8 innocents./s
In my view, G4 has a "tell." He lies and then closes his eyes and looks down. He also came across to me as someone who is contemptuous of others, including the prosecutor. The insistence on "can I tell the whole story?" in a contemptuous, challenging tone, instead of answering questions can be contrasted with the testimony of TC and Beth, who took even very personal questions about traumatic behavior head on, eyes up, and without anger or contempt for the prosecutor.
I wouldn't be surprised to see TC on the stand again in rebuttal. I believed her. She was a strong witness. But the closing should be a lot of visual aids about the lies G4 told on the stand, about the changing stories and contradictions.