rsd1200
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2016
- Messages
- 11,477
- Reaction score
- 30,754
Ok girl, help me with this.
After reading hundreds of pages regarding the benefits of joint or individual trials. My understanding is the 4 can be tried together because the charges overlap. And, severed trials are often the result of a co-defendant confessing or offering info that implicates the other.
Do you think this is the reason it’s predetermined to have separate trials? Because someone anticipates a confession?
Common Problems With Co-Defendant Cases | Tallahassee
I read this faster than the W’s packed for AK, it’s quite interesting.
Baha! That last line!
I think that will be it. I don't see a way to try them together. The speedy trial part, AW's paperwork did not have a date inserted for that portion. Idk if that's relevant or not, just remembering back. If she has an open date though, would she go last? Again, IANAL.
Also, let's say G4, rolls on them all and is part of a Co-Defendant case, he can, in court, decide to apply is Fifth Amendment rights, and not speak a word. If he does, then the other four lose their Sixth Amendment Right to be confronted by him, and his testimony. Screws the entire case up.
Sixth Amendment;
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.