OH Pike County: 8 in Rhoden Family Murdered Over Custody Issue 4 Members Wagner Family Arrested#40

[Sleuthinsleuther]

Keep in mind that the word "informant" was never used in any description...

What was the wording?

 

[Sleuthinsleuther]

If I was the W’s there is no way I’m letting RW catch wind of this. She just has that tattle tail look. Moo sorry jmo

 

[Loomis124]

Huh no way. We are riding this thinggg out we got 12 jurors all must prove guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Atleast one will flat out walk.


In all honesty, why plead guilty when you are tryin to walk right out that door ?

Flat out walk? Surely you jest. IMO

Reminds me of, "The killers will never be caught. This is a cold case"...etc etc etc. JMO

 

[Betty P]

Awful For RW. She can’t possibly keep this up, imo.
Poor thing. How she must wish to be home with her dogs & horses. Literally, she could make herself sick trying to make every court appearance, imo.

TBH, she might consider that she doesn't need to help these killers. They're accused of killing 8 innocent people, 4 of them teens and young adults with toddlers and infants. The evidence is pretty strong. Her own mother was involved in the cover up, obstruction of justice, etc. Living at home, they came very close to getting arrested.

She might want to re-think what she owes these monsters. JMO, she doesn't owe them anything. God forbid she would want to see them released from jail.

Hope she gets some counseling or help and moves on with her own life.

 

[Loomis124]

I don’t believe FW is evil, unless she knew about these murders before hand. But If she found out after the fact then well she’s just protecting her family, id expect my family to do the same

RW is not involved, no way. She is like that lonely girl in the movie. They kept everything a secret from her cause they know she will go tattle

That brings the question: did she eventually find out and report it to authoritah? Or is she not the confidential informant?

Lol JMO

 

[JustaboyFromMS]

TBH, she might consider that she doesn't need to help these killers. They're accused of killing 8 innocent people, 4 of them teens and young adults with toddlers and infants. The evidence is pretty strong. Her own mother was involved in the cover up, obstruction of justice, etc. Living at home, they came very close to getting arrested.

She might want to re-think what she owes these monsters. JMO, she doesn't owe them anything. God forbid she would want to see them released from jail.

Hope she gets some counseling or help and moves on with her own life.

I understand where you are coming from, but I also understand her standing by her fam. If I were in her shoes I couldn't/wouldn't turn my back on them. It's all subjective tho.

 

[Loomis124]

Keep in mind that the word "informant" was never used in any description...

Noted

 

[Betty P]

I don’t believe FW is evil, unless she knew about these murders before hand. But If she found out after the fact then well she’s just protecting her family, id expect my family to do the same

RW is not involved, no way. She is like that lonely girl in the movie. They kept everything a secret from her cause they know she will go tattle

That brings the question: did she eventually find out and report it to authoritah? Or is she not the confidential informant?

Prosecutor Canepa told the judge at FW's arraignment that FW participated in the planning talk to kill DeWine and Reader and to help each other escape from jail/prison. She may not have pulled a trigger, but she helped plan revenge and lied to the GJ to keep the murderers from being arrested and charged.

She doesn't deserve any sympathy once she crossed that line. JMO

 

[Dudly]

Has this been posted?

2018CR000156 STATE OF OHIO -vs- WAGNER, ANGELA JO
Case Type: CRIMINAL
Case Status: Open
File Date: 11/13/2018
Action: AGGRAVATED MURDER
Case Judge: DEERING, RANDY D
Next Event: 03/20/2019

All Information
Party
Charge
Event
Docket
Disposition
Docket Information
Date
Docket Text

11/13/2018
SPECIAL PROJECT FUND
11/13/2018
REPARATION FUND
11/13/2018
INDICTMENT FILED
11/13/2018
WARRANT ON INDICTMENT ISSUED
11/14/2018
NOTICE TO SUPREME COURT OF OHIO OF FILING OF INDICTMENT CHARGING AGGRAVATED MURDER WITH SPECIFICATION(S) OF AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES
11/16/2018
FILED COPY OF NOTICE TO SUPREME COURT OF OHIO OF FILING OF INDICTMENT CHARGING AGGRAVATED MURDER WITH SPECIFICATION(S) OF AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES FILED
11/16/2018
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT (VIA FAX)
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
11/16/2018
MOTION AND MEMORANDUM REQUESTING BILL OF PARTICULARS FILED (VIA FAX)
11/19/2018
DEFENDANT'S DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY (VIA FAX)
11/21/2018
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Judge: DEERING, RANDY D
Event: ARRAIGNMENT
Date: 11/29/2018 Time: 01:30 PM
11/26/2018
RETURN FROM SCIOTO CO SHERIFF -- WARRANT SERVED 11/13/18
11/29/2018
CERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER FEE
11/30/2018
INDIGENT APPLICATION FILED
11/30/2018
JOURNAL ENTRY - AMENDING INDICTMENT LANGUAGE OF COUNT NINE SOLELY WITH RESPECT TO THE CODE SECTION NUMBER STATED IN COUNT NINE FOR THE OFFENSE OF "CONSPIRACY," BY CHANGING THE NUMBER FROM "2903.01(A)(1) AND/OR (A)(2)/2903.01(J)(1)" TO "2923.01(A)(1) AND/OR (A)(2)/2923.01(J)(1)."; THE COURT FINDS THAT THE INCORRECT SECTION NUMBER RESULTS FROM CLERICAL ERROR AND THAT SUCH AMENDMENT DOES NOT CHANGE THE NAME OR IDENITY OF THE CRIME CHARGED
11/30/2018
ARRAIGNMENT
11/30/2018
JOURNAL ENTRY APPOINTING ATTORNEY ROBERT F KRAPENC AS LEAD COUNSEL AND MARK M HUNT AS CO-COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT
11/30/2018
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Judge: DEERING, RANDY D
Event: PRE-TRIAL
Date: 01/07/2019 Time: 01:30 PM
11/30/2018
COSTS FOR NOTICES MAILED
11/30/2018
WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL FILED
12/14/2018
(1) DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR NOTICE OF STATE'S EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO OHIO R.CRIM. P. 12(E)(2) FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(2) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF EXCULPATORY AND IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(3) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF THE JUVENILE RECORDS OF PLAINTIFF'S WITNESSES FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(4) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCLOSURE OF AGGRAVATING FACTORS AND INFORMATION RELATING TO MITIGATING FACTORS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(5) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS TO TURN OVER AND ADVISE THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF ALL INFORMATION ACQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF INVESTIGATION FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(6) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THAT A COMPLETE COPY OF THE PROSECUTOR'S FILE BE MADE AND TURNED OVER TO THE COURT FOR RVIEW AND TO BE SEALED FOR APPELLATE REVIEW, IF NECESSARY FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(7) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROPERLY PRESERVE AND CATALOG ALL PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(8) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSCRIBE THE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS PRIOR TO TRIAL FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A PRE-TRIAL COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(10( DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISCLOSE NAMES OF GRAND JURY WITNESSES FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(11) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS CAPITAL COMPONENTS OF THIS CASE DUE TO CONSTITUTIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW VIOLATIONS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(12) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ALL MOTIONS TO BE HEARD ON THE RECORD FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(13) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RULINGS ON ALL MOTIONS NO LATER THAN THE START OF VOIR DIRE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(14) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A STENOGRAPHIC RECORD OF ALL COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(15) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RECORD ALL SIDEBAR PROCEEDINGS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(16) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DAILY TRANSCRIPTS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(17) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RESTRAIN CERTAIN PARTIES FROM DISCUSSING THE CASE WITH ACCUSED FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(18) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PERMIT ACCUSED TO APPEAR IN CIVILIAN CLOTHING AND WITHOUT RESTRAINTS AT ALL PROCEEDINGS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(19) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(20) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO HAVE REASONS FOR DEFENSE OBJECTIONS AND REASONS FOR OVERRULING DEFENSE OBJECTIONS PLACED ON THE RECORD FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(21) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT ANY REFERENCES TO THE FIRST PHASE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS AS THE "GUILT PHASE" FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(22) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A COURTROOM DECORUM ORDER TO ENSURE A FAIR TRIAL FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(23) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUBMIT A DETAILED JURY QUESTIONNAIRE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(24) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIAL PROCEDURES TO INSULATE THE VENIRE AND THE EMPANELLED JURY FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(25) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEQUESTERED VOIR DIRE ON DEATH PENALTY, PUBLICITY, AND OTHER ISSUES FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(26) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ALTERNATING INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(27) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR COMPREHENSIVE VOIR DIRE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(28) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO HAVE THE COURT FOLLOW THE O.R.C. 2945.25(C) STANDARD FOR "DEATH-QUALIFICATION" OF VENIREPERSONS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(29) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE VENIREPERSONS WHO CANNOT FAIRLY CONSIDER MITIGATING EVIDENCE AND/OR WHO WOULD AUTOMATICALLY VOTE FOR DEATH UPON A FINDING OF GUILT IN THE CULPABILITY PHASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(30) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT THE STATE'S USE OF PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES TO EXCLUDE VENIREPERSONS WITH CONCERNS ABOUT IMPOSING THE DEATH PENALTY FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(31) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING OHIO R. EVID. 803(8): LIMITED ADMISSIBILITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT RECORDS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(32) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING THE INADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR TESTIMONY FROM A WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(33) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE RELATING TO OTHER CRIMES, WRONGS OR ACTS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(34) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT THE PREJUDICIAL DISPLAY OF TANGIBLE THINGS AND/OR PHOTOGRAPHS DURING TRIAL FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(35) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE DECEASED FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(36) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT VICTIM-IMPACT EVIDENCE DURING THE TRIAL AND, IF NECESSARY, THE MITIGATION PHASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(37) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DETERMINE AND LIMIT PLAINTIFF'S SENTENCING PHASE EVIDENCE OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(38) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT THE STATE FROM EMPLOYING PREJUDICIAL ARGUMENTS AND THEMES FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(39) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR INSTRUCTION THAT THE DEFENDANT BEARS NO BURDEN OF PROOF AT THE MITIGATING PHASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(40) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS RELATED TO ANY "MENTAL HEALTH" EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN MITIGATION FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(41) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO LIMIT SCOPE OF ANY REBUTTAL EVIDENCE OFFERED BY THE STATE IN THE MITIGATION PHASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(42) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT THE PROSECUTOR FROM ARGUING AND THE COURT FROM GIVING INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING STATUTORY MITIGATING FACTORS NOT RAISED BY THE DEFENSE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(43) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF MITIGATING EVIDENCE THAT POST-DATES DEFENDANT'S ARREST FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(44) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AVOID COERCIVE PRACTICES DURING MITIGATION PHASE DELIBERATIONS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(45) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT THE STATE FROM COMMENTING ON DEFENDANT'S UNSWORN STATEMENT FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(46) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT REFERENCES TO THE JURY THAT A DEATH PENALTY VERDICT IS ONLY A RECOMMENDATION TO THE TRIAL JUDGE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(47) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ALLOW THE DEFENSE TO ARGUE LAST AT THE MITIGATION PHASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(48) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR WRITTEN JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND AN OPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THEM BEFORE THE JURY IS INSTRUCTED FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(49) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO INSTRUCT THE JURY TO CONSIDER MERCY IN ITS MITIGATION PHASE DELIBERATIONS, AND TO PROHIBIT THE PROSECUTOR FROM ARGUING THAT THE JURY SHOULD NOT CONSIDER MERCY FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/27/2018
JOURNAL ENTRY -- THE CLERK OF COURTS OF CLARK COUNTY, HAVING BEEN APPOINTED AS SPECIAL DEPUTY CLERK OF COURTS, SHALL CONVEY INTO THE CUSTODY OF JUSTIN P. BREWSTER, CLERK OF COURTS OF PIKE COUNTY ALL DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS PERTAINING TO THIS MATTER; THE CLARK COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS IS DISCHARGED OF ANY FURTHER RESPONSIBILITIES AS SPECIAL DEPUTY CLERK
COPIES FILED MAILED TO COUNSEL, DEFENDANTS, PROSECUTORS
01/07/2019
IDENTIFICATION OF DISCOVERY PROVIDED FILED
01/07/2019
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Judge: DEERING, RANDY D
Event: PRE-TRIAL
Date: 03/20/2019 Time: 01:30 PM
01/07/2019
COSTS FOR NOTICES MAILED
01/07/2019
CERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER FEE

eServices provided by equivant.
CourtView Justice Solutions Inc. an equivant company, Copyright 2019
1.26.01
WCAG Compliance

 

[Loomis124]

What was the wording?

"confidential information resource."

 

[Betty P]

I understand where you are coming from, but I also understand her standing by her fam. If I were in her shoes I couldn't/wouldn't turn my back on them. It's all subjective tho.

I could understand someone supporting their family even if they were mass killers. Put some money in their commissary account, visit them now and then. But turning your own life upside down, getting very stressed, spending money, working 24/7 trying to get them out of jail and acquitted is different. JMO.

Note her other brother isn't involved in this effort.

 

[Betty P]

Has this been posted?

2018CR000156 STATE OF OHIO -vs- WAGNER, ANGELA JO
Case Type: CRIMINAL
Case Status: Open
File Date: 11/13/2018
Action: AGGRAVATED MURDER
Case Judge: DEERING, RANDY D
Next Event: 03/20/2019

All Information
Party
Charge
Event
Docket
Disposition
Docket Information
Date
Docket Text

11/13/2018
SPECIAL PROJECT FUND
11/13/2018
REPARATION FUND
11/13/2018
INDICTMENT FILED
11/13/2018
WARRANT ON INDICTMENT ISSUED
11/14/2018
NOTICE TO SUPREME COURT OF OHIO OF FILING OF INDICTMENT CHARGING AGGRAVATED MURDER WITH SPECIFICATION(S) OF AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES
11/16/2018
FILED COPY OF NOTICE TO SUPREME COURT OF OHIO OF FILING OF INDICTMENT CHARGING AGGRAVATED MURDER WITH SPECIFICATION(S) OF AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES FILED
11/16/2018
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT (VIA FAX)
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
11/16/2018
MOTION AND MEMORANDUM REQUESTING BILL OF PARTICULARS FILED (VIA FAX)
11/19/2018
DEFENDANT'S DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY (VIA FAX)
11/21/2018
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Judge: DEERING, RANDY D
Event: ARRAIGNMENT
Date: 11/29/2018 Time: 01:30 PM
11/26/2018
RETURN FROM SCIOTO CO SHERIFF -- WARRANT SERVED 11/13/18
11/29/2018
CERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER FEE
11/30/2018
INDIGENT APPLICATION FILED
11/30/2018
JOURNAL ENTRY - AMENDING INDICTMENT LANGUAGE OF COUNT NINE SOLELY WITH RESPECT TO THE CODE SECTION NUMBER STATED IN COUNT NINE FOR THE OFFENSE OF "CONSPIRACY," BY CHANGING THE NUMBER FROM "2903.01(A)(1) AND/OR (A)(2)/2903.01(J)(1)" TO "2923.01(A)(1) AND/OR (A)(2)/2923.01(J)(1)."; THE COURT FINDS THAT THE INCORRECT SECTION NUMBER RESULTS FROM CLERICAL ERROR AND THAT SUCH AMENDMENT DOES NOT CHANGE THE NAME OR IDENITY OF THE CRIME CHARGED
11/30/2018
ARRAIGNMENT
11/30/2018
JOURNAL ENTRY APPOINTING ATTORNEY ROBERT F KRAPENC AS LEAD COUNSEL AND MARK M HUNT AS CO-COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT
11/30/2018
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Judge: DEERING, RANDY D
Event: PRE-TRIAL
Date: 01/07/2019 Time: 01:30 PM
11/30/2018
COSTS FOR NOTICES MAILED
11/30/2018
WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL FILED
12/14/2018
(1) DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR NOTICE OF STATE'S EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO OHIO R.CRIM. P. 12(E)(2) FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(2) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF EXCULPATORY AND IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(3) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF THE JUVENILE RECORDS OF PLAINTIFF'S WITNESSES FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(4) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCLOSURE OF AGGRAVATING FACTORS AND INFORMATION RELATING TO MITIGATING FACTORS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(5) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS TO TURN OVER AND ADVISE THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF ALL INFORMATION ACQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF INVESTIGATION FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(6) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THAT A COMPLETE COPY OF THE PROSECUTOR'S FILE BE MADE AND TURNED OVER TO THE COURT FOR RVIEW AND TO BE SEALED FOR APPELLATE REVIEW, IF NECESSARY FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(7) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROPERLY PRESERVE AND CATALOG ALL PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(8) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSCRIBE THE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS PRIOR TO TRIAL FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A PRE-TRIAL COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(10( DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISCLOSE NAMES OF GRAND JURY WITNESSES FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(11) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS CAPITAL COMPONENTS OF THIS CASE DUE TO CONSTITUTIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW VIOLATIONS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(12) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ALL MOTIONS TO BE HEARD ON THE RECORD FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(13) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RULINGS ON ALL MOTIONS NO LATER THAN THE START OF VOIR DIRE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(14) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A STENOGRAPHIC RECORD OF ALL COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(15) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RECORD ALL SIDEBAR PROCEEDINGS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(16) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DAILY TRANSCRIPTS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(17) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RESTRAIN CERTAIN PARTIES FROM DISCUSSING THE CASE WITH ACCUSED FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(18) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PERMIT ACCUSED TO APPEAR IN CIVILIAN CLOTHING AND WITHOUT RESTRAINTS AT ALL PROCEEDINGS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(19) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(20) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO HAVE REASONS FOR DEFENSE OBJECTIONS AND REASONS FOR OVERRULING DEFENSE OBJECTIONS PLACED ON THE RECORD FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(21) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT ANY REFERENCES TO THE FIRST PHASE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS AS THE "GUILT PHASE" FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(22) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A COURTROOM DECORUM ORDER TO ENSURE A FAIR TRIAL FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(23) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUBMIT A DETAILED JURY QUESTIONNAIRE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(24) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIAL PROCEDURES TO INSULATE THE VENIRE AND THE EMPANELLED JURY FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(25) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEQUESTERED VOIR DIRE ON DEATH PENALTY, PUBLICITY, AND OTHER ISSUES FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(26) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ALTERNATING INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(27) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR COMPREHENSIVE VOIR DIRE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(28) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO HAVE THE COURT FOLLOW THE O.R.C. 2945.25(C) STANDARD FOR "DEATH-QUALIFICATION" OF VENIREPERSONS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(29) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE VENIREPERSONS WHO CANNOT FAIRLY CONSIDER MITIGATING EVIDENCE AND/OR WHO WOULD AUTOMATICALLY VOTE FOR DEATH UPON A FINDING OF GUILT IN THE CULPABILITY PHASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(30) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT THE STATE'S USE OF PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES TO EXCLUDE VENIREPERSONS WITH CONCERNS ABOUT IMPOSING THE DEATH PENALTY FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(31) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING OHIO R. EVID. 803(8): LIMITED ADMISSIBILITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT RECORDS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(32) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING THE INADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR TESTIMONY FROM A WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(33) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE RELATING TO OTHER CRIMES, WRONGS OR ACTS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(34) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT THE PREJUDICIAL DISPLAY OF TANGIBLE THINGS AND/OR PHOTOGRAPHS DURING TRIAL FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(35) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE DECEASED FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(36) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT VICTIM-IMPACT EVIDENCE DURING THE TRIAL AND, IF NECESSARY, THE MITIGATION PHASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(37) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DETERMINE AND LIMIT PLAINTIFF'S SENTENCING PHASE EVIDENCE OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(38) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT THE STATE FROM EMPLOYING PREJUDICIAL ARGUMENTS AND THEMES FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(39) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR INSTRUCTION THAT THE DEFENDANT BEARS NO BURDEN OF PROOF AT THE MITIGATING PHASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(40) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS RELATED TO ANY "MENTAL HEALTH" EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN MITIGATION FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(41) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO LIMIT SCOPE OF ANY REBUTTAL EVIDENCE OFFERED BY THE STATE IN THE MITIGATION PHASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(42) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT THE PROSECUTOR FROM ARGUING AND THE COURT FROM GIVING INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING STATUTORY MITIGATING FACTORS NOT RAISED BY THE DEFENSE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(43) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF MITIGATING EVIDENCE THAT POST-DATES DEFENDANT'S ARREST FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(44) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AVOID COERCIVE PRACTICES DURING MITIGATION PHASE DELIBERATIONS FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(45) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT THE STATE FROM COMMENTING ON DEFENDANT'S UNSWORN STATEMENT FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(46) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT REFERENCES TO THE JURY THAT A DEATH PENALTY VERDICT IS ONLY A RECOMMENDATION TO THE TRIAL JUDGE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(47) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ALLOW THE DEFENSE TO ARGUE LAST AT THE MITIGATION PHASE FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(48) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR WRITTEN JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND AN OPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THEM BEFORE THE JURY IS INSTRUCTED FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/14/2018
(49) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO INSTRUCT THE JURY TO CONSIDER MERCY IN ITS MITIGATION PHASE DELIBERATIONS, AND TO PROHIBIT THE PROSECUTOR FROM ARGUING THAT THE JURY SHOULD NOT CONSIDER MERCY FILED
Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
12/27/2018
JOURNAL ENTRY -- THE CLERK OF COURTS OF CLARK COUNTY, HAVING BEEN APPOINTED AS SPECIAL DEPUTY CLERK OF COURTS, SHALL CONVEY INTO THE CUSTODY OF JUSTIN P. BREWSTER, CLERK OF COURTS OF PIKE COUNTY ALL DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS PERTAINING TO THIS MATTER; THE CLARK COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS IS DISCHARGED OF ANY FURTHER RESPONSIBILITIES AS SPECIAL DEPUTY CLERK
COPIES FILED MAILED TO COUNSEL, DEFENDANTS, PROSECUTORS
01/07/2019
IDENTIFICATION OF DISCOVERY PROVIDED FILED
01/07/2019
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Judge: DEERING, RANDY D
Event: PRE-TRIAL
Date: 03/20/2019 Time: 01:30 PM
01/07/2019
COSTS FOR NOTICES MAILED
01/07/2019
CERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER FEE

eServices provided by equivant.
CourtView Justice Solutions Inc. an equivant company, Copyright 2019
1.26.01
WCAG Compliance

Thanks! I've looked at these online. Thanks for posting.

 

[Trudie]

TBH, she might consider that she doesn't need to help these killers. They're accused of killing 8 innocent people, 4 of them teens and young adults with toddlers and infants. The evidence is pretty strong. Her own mother was involved in the cover up, obstruction of justice, etc. Living at home, they came very close to getting arrested.

She might want to re-think what she owes these monsters. JMO, she doesn't owe them anything. God forbid she would want to see them released from jail.

Hope she gets some counseling or help and moves on with her own life.

She’s going to burnout, imo. Emotionally, it must be difficult for her to be in the same room with co-victims. Especially when she’s alone. Other than her horse show circuit, I think she’s not had a lot of public exposure, maybe.
IMO, the show circuit is its own world. I bet she’s magnificent with animals.

 

[Loomis124]

I could understand someone supporting their family even if they were mass killers. Put some money in their commissary account, visit them now and then. But turning your own life upside down, getting very stressed, spending money, working 24/7 trying to get them out of jail and acquitted is different. JMO.

Note her other brother isn't involved in this effort.

Yes! It will be super interesting to see if this one shows up tomorrow to support FCW! If so, my bet is she's threatening to write him out of her will. But, how much, if any, will she have left after supporting the other four in jail for the next umptine years? Her son seems to have made his own way and rose above the baggage. BTW why wasn't he a "George?" All JMO.

 

[Trudie]

Also, the legal teams might like their client to have support, imo. Set the stage “this young man is loved”.
Jmo

 

[Trudie]

Yes! It will be super interesting to see if this one shows up tomorrow to support FCW! If so, my bet is she's threatening to write him out of her will. But, how much, if any, will she have left after supporting the other four in jail for the next umptine years? Her son seems to have made his own way and rose above the baggage. BTW why wasn't he a "George?" All JMO.

Oh I think he will be there, with his wife., to support his mom.
Jmo

 

[JustaboyFromMS]

I could understand someone supporting their family even if they were mass killers. Put some money in their commissary account, visit them now and then. But turning your own life upside down, getting very stressed, spending money, working 24/7 trying to get them out of jail and acquitted is different. JMO.

Note her other brother isn't involved in this effort.

There is no playbook on how to act accordingly in these circumstances. Im not saying you are wrong, but you shouldn't condemn or criticize her actions. The only thing she is guilty of is being loyal to her fam. JMO,MOO

 

[Trudie]

There is no playbook on how to act accordingly in these circumstances. Im not saying you are wrong, but you shouldn't condemn or criticize her actions. The only thing she is guilty of is being loyal to her fam. JMO,MOO

We’re not allowed to tell other posters what they should or should not post or think. I recently asked Tricia about this, for my own sanity.

 

[JustaboyFromMS]

We’re not allowed to tell other posters what they should or should not post or think. I recently asked Tricia about this, for my own sanity.

Coincidentally, that is exactly what you are doing. JMO

 

[Trudie]

POLL of sorts.

If you’re facing the death penalty, would you plead guilty, to continue living? I would.

Hit “like” if you would plead guilty. please & tysm

Wow. Only three of us would choose to live.