OH Pike County: 8 in Rhoden Family Murdered Over Custody Issue 4 Members Wagner Family Arrested#41

[Sleuthinsleuther]

G3 appears 01/17

What are the next batch of court date tysm

 

[Cool Cats]

Dudly and Trudy. I found one of the articles I said I'd look for (discussed in the previous thread.) Scroll all the way down because at the end are quite a few Facebook quotes (but they are contained in this MSM article.) Article is longer than it seems.

It's about that big confrontation on UHR. The Rhodens and friends were patrolling the area. Add the 2 fights to that and there was definitely tension leading up to April 22nd 2016.

10 Days before Pike County massacre, family patrolled property with firearms - Knowledge Glue

 

[Trudie]

Dudly and Trudy. I found one of the articles I said I'd look for (discussed in the previous thread.) Scroll all the way down because at the end are a few Facebook quotes but they are contained in this MSM article.

It's about that big confrontation on UHR. The Rhodens and friends were patrolling the area. Add the 2 fights to that and there was definitely tension leading up to April 22nd 2016.

10 Days before Pike County massacre, family patrolled property with firearms - Knowledge Glue

Betty needs this, I think, for her timeline
Thanks CC

 

[Johnny B Bad]

Why is FW sitting in the gallery of the courtroom with her daughter, as if she's a spectator, not the defendant? It appears FW is the most defiant in the family, assumes the rules don't apply to her. JMO
Hey Betty P. What better way to have someone on to knock -off someone on their list than a Mentally Channeled person, it would be easy to talk a grown-up into it
If you told them they where going to harm the family.JMO



Better keep an eye on her.

 

[Myland]

She also listened in on their plans to seek revenge against LE and did nothing to stop them. That's pretty serious.

That is not part of the charge in the indictment. Jmo

 

[Betty P]

Betty needs this, I think, for her timeline
Thanks CC

I just read it. I'm not sure I can use it. It doesn't look like a valid MSM source. Seems to be based on a bunch of FB posts, which also aren't allowed. Not saying it isn't true, just not sure what Mods would say.

 

[Betty P]

That is not part of the charge in the indictment. Jmo

Yes, we know. Some of us were discussing this earlier. We assume prosecution has a reason for not going for that charge. We'll find out.

JMO

 

[Myland]

About the revenge talk, yes, FW is being accused of having been there. Prosecutor: "on at least one occasion...in which she was present along with her now capitol crime defendants (the 4 Wagners.)

... The State does have concerns about her participation in those conversations and potential efforts coordinating any of those sorts of efforts".
(Revenge/Escape)

And the prosecutor said "she discussed at length her Grand Jury Testimony with the 4 capital crime defendants."

She is not charged with anything to do with revenge. She is charged with one lie. Jmo

 

[Trudie]

That is not part of the charge in the indictment. Jmo

It’s really hard to prove what any person may or may not have heard.
A grand jury would prob indict though. Jmo

 

[Loomis124]

Why is the defense attorney so aggressive toward the prosecutors? He talks about tainted jury pools and all this other nonsense, but he grandstands far more than the prosecutors. Enjoy your 15 minutes I suppose. Anyway, if in fact she participated and/or was present during the revenge talk against LE why isn't she being charged? Did I miss something?

JMO

I agree. And did you notice he's the only defense attorney that turns around to the Rhodens while he's talking? What's his point there? JMO

 

[Myland]

Yes, we know. Some of us were discussing this earlier. We assume prosecution has a reason for not going for that charge. We'll find out.

JMO

It most likely is lack of evidence or they would jmo

 

[Cool Cats]

Betty needs this, I think, for her timeline
Thanks CC

Nice of her to do this timeline.

Just make sure to scroll way down as I thought the article ended then found out it's longer than it looks. A lot of Facebook quotes at end but they are contained in this mainstream media article.

 

[MsJosie]

I just read it. I'm not sure I can use it. It doesn't look like a valid MSM source. Seems to be based on a bunch of FB posts, which also aren't allowed. Not saying it isn't true, just not sure what Mods would say.

Ask the Mods.....never hurts to ask!

Thanks for all the winformation work!

 

[Myland]

Well, that will be up to the jury to determine.

If LE found those BPV's were used in the murders, lying about such a thing is called Obstruction of Justice. She's been charged with that.

LE likely took them as evidence and had them tested for blood, etc.

I thought according to the prosecutor today both counts relate to one particular alleged lie jmo

 

[Cool Cats]

She is not charged with anything to do with revenge. She is charged with one lie. Jmo

Trudie wanted to know if the prosecution was accusing FW as being present during the conversations at her house and I was quoting the prosecutor to show that, yes, the prosecution does say she was present, and they felt it should give her a higher bail.

 

[Loomis124]

Yes, that's what I'm referring to as well. Prosecutor Junk was also in charge of the GJ. He would have made sure she could hear the questions last July, when she testified before the GJ. She was probably asked quite a few questions that day and it seems odd that she's claiming that was the only question she may not have heard correctly.

Prosecutors and courts are accustomed to these tactics by defense attys and their clients. They know how to deal with them. BTW, she seemed to hear everything very well today and the last time.

Exactly my point. Thank you, Betty.

 

[Loomis124]

Well, that will be up to the jury to determine.

If LE found those BPV's were used in the murders, lying about such a thing is called Obstruction of Justice. She's been charged with that.

LE likely took them as evidence and had them tested for blood, etc.

I'd think for sure they'd have DNA on them.

 

[JustaboyFromMS]

Just now getting home from work. Incase anyone missed it like myself...

Does anyone have a copy of the bill of particulars that was filed today? TIA

 

[Cool Cats]

I just read it. I'm not sure I can use it. It doesn't look like a valid MSM source. Seems to be based on a bunch of FB posts, which also aren't allowed. Not saying it isn't true, just not sure what Mods would say.

How do I ask the mods if this article is ok to link? I thought it was fine but maybe not.

 

[Myland]

Trudie wanted to know if the prosecution was accusing FW as being present during the conversations at her house and I was quoting the prosecutor to show that, yes, the prosecution does say she was present, and they felt it should give her a higher bail.

To me the prosecutor was misleading then in that claim because they only charged her with one lie jmo