The defense specifically asked the prosecutor today and she said yes count 1 and 2 is about the one lieOne lie accounts for count #2-----Felony 3rd degree perjury.
So how do they also get count #1 out of it? Count#1------Felony 5th degree obstructing justice.
If it's only one lie, is it standard to charge a person with 2 felony counts?
Any law clerks/attorneys out there?
I am going to ask my attorney (get his opinion) why she is being charged for 2 felonies... Must be standard but doesn't make sense to me. Sounds trumped up.The defense specifically asked the prosecutor today and she said yes count 1 and 2 is about the one lie
Turns out there was no illegal animal fighting there. DeWine & Reader said they were only raising them there. We've discussed this here more than a few times.
Pike County murders: 5 unanswered questions 1 year later
The judge even said the same statement is the basis for counts one and two jmoThe defense specifically asked the prosecutor today and she said yes count 1 and 2 is about the one lie
The defense specifically asked the prosecutor today and she said yes count 1 and 2 is about the one lie
I am going to ask my attorney why she is being charged for 2 felonies... Must be standard but doesn't make sense to me. Sounds trumped up.
Meh. The will rule on it later. No sense arguing about it today.
she's still going to be on house arrest
she is still known to have sat in a meeting listening to her family make plans to kill the AG & local sheriff and did nothing
her son, DIL and two grandsons likely brutally murdered 8 innocent people
She's not a good person, JMO. We'll see what develops, looking forward to hearing the state's argument and judge's ruling. Personally, I think it's theatrics and drama on her part and that of her attorney.It's what they're paid to do.
you and I are on the same wavelength sometimes. I agree with you absolutely. They do this to get people to plead, is one reason.I had the attorney I date read the indictments (all of them), he thought the language is very odd. Remember, it’s like a DUI citation. Have you ever known a DUI not include at least one of these: resisting arrest, weaving, tail light out, failure to signal, license plate not illuminated, improper lane change........and on & on. One charge does not adhere so well. Moo
Sorry Betty not to argue but the defense also referenced Dewine basically not stating thing factually Jmo so if she was involved in that why is she not at least charged with it jmoMeh. The will rule on it later. No sense arguing about it today.
she's still going to be on house arrest
she is still known to have sat in a meeting listening to her family make plans to kill the AG & local sheriff and did nothing
her son, DIL and two grandsons likely brutally murdered 8 innocent people
She's not a good person, JMO. We'll see what develops, looking forward to hearing the state's argument and judge's ruling. Personally, I think it's theatrics and drama on her part and that of her attorney.It's what they're paid to do.
I am going to ask my attorney (get his opinion) why she is being charged for 2 felonies... Must be standard but doesn't make sense to me. Sounds trumped up.
Thank you Dudley! Do you also have access to the bill of particulars? If you cannot post on this open forum where on SM that you found FW discovery can you PM it to me? ThanksA lot of purchases from Amazon....
She was a bobble head today as she listened to the judge. If this is all the prosecutors have against her, I don't know what to think. I guess it would depend on how the question(s) were framed at the GJ. JMO
Does anyone else believe more charges could be filed against her, if she actively participated and/or was present in the revenge talk? This seems to be a more serious allegation.
It most likely is lack of evidence or they would jmo
We’re all entitled to our opinion.
Am I allowed to quote a post on a dif thread and paste here?
ok, thanks.I'm not a Mod, but if it's a thread from WS, it should be ok.
Yes raising roosters for cockfighting.
Yes that is a lot of purchases, but remember she owns several businesses and that is a time span of 4 years. JmoA lot of purchases from Amazon....
yea, then if they don’t return an indictment, the DA goes to GJ again, with more, again.....sonon, until they get an indictment. Moo.IMO, to the contrary. Based on GJ facts I've read, the GJ is given the "minimum" evidence to secure an indictment. IMO, good, hard evidence galore is yet to come. Surprises with every hearing. Yay Yay