Mr. Pate Jax 49 Post # 430 Thread # 18 just posted that today. If that helps.
I don't think what I posted included who was shot how many times. IIRC, we did see that specific info somewhere. (gone searching)
Mr. Pate Jax 49 Post # 430 Thread # 18 just posted that today. If that helps.
If I can insert my opinion, Check me if I am wrong..killers would be out of character to use revolvers For their
slaughter.why? Because to reload, you must innsert. one shell at a time and break the pistol in a position to
insert the shells one at a time.Remember it was dark or limited light available and he/she had to be a genius
to reload in the dark.It is possible if the killer used a revolver ever day and could flip the cylinder by the touch
of his finger.In My Opinion, the killer woul consider those problems and stay away from using a revolver.
I had a H&K .40 caliber USP for work. Holds 13 rounds. I think it would be a good amount for each household.Until there is something posted concerning the caliber of weapons used, I have to speculate from memory the facts
that I know about hand guns. I think it is important to outline what caliber the handguns were and try to eliminate
the caliber that would not fit this slaughter. I think 22's are out unless we get word that 22's In fact were in the mix.
My information tells me that 32 shots were used for a total for all victims. A 38 caliber handgun,S.& W., holds 6 shells.
I had a short barrel 32 caliber that held 5 shells.,,Also, S.& W...I can't find the thread that describes the number of
Shots that each victim received, but I believe many received 3 and CR1 received more. If all shots were fired
in some random order, two victims would require one weapon and then reload in the dark walking to the next target
Somebody help me find the thread that outlines the names of victims and the number of shots received. We can figure
this out with your help.Please..
I was just reading back through some articles and one sentence really stood out to me. I know it's been out there a long time but with everything that has been discussed over the last two months, it just stood out to me.
While nothing has been ruled out, it is unlikely this was a random act of violence or a crime committed by another member of the Rhoden family. http://www.daytond ailynews.com/news/ news/4-possible-mo tives-in-pike-coun ty-ohio-murders/nr B9q/
Also,, I know some people were discussing earlier that they were worried the killers are out on the streets. Maybe they are already in jail. Yes, I am an #ID channel junkie
On the shows they often pick the suspects up on old warrants or something else and then keep them in jail until they can put a case together on murder charges.
There are speed loaders made for revolvers...
We know Kenny had one bullet, Chris had nine bullets, Gary had three bullets. That leaves 19 bullets for the other five victims, making a total of 32 bullets. I don't know why LE has not broken those 19 down to the remaining victims. Surely that info could be released, as well as the official times of death. Maybe that's not really important by LE thinking, but it would help us put things in perspective. I don't see how that info could have any affect on the case. Are autopsies public info in Ohio?[/QUOTE
JMO but although we can pretty much keep our cool on this website; I don't know if the general public can. ( also passionate fan of ID channel). If you lived in pike county and knew the younger victims or Dana, and heard they had been shot five times in the head and had been badly beaten how would you react? You talk about HIllbilly Justice......I think that's part of the reason they haven't let us know about who was shot how many times.
Of course I was rattling off information that dawned on me from trying to get a perspective on one man perpetrator,
Cartel perpetrators, etc.anyone..The way I was inserting types of weapons was irregular to say the least, but there are
certain criteria that must be released for me to form much of a worthy speculation.What I want to know is: the order in
which the victims were selected..Of course the size and type of weapon would help...I think we can assume that all
weapons were of a cheap brand.(throw-a-ways) However,throw-a-ways might jam and the killer never viewed using
cheap weapons because of a desire to be professional..And I am leaning on the theory that the serial killer acted
alone and his motive was to rid the world of undesirables...don't blame me for rattling on.J.M.O. Again
Respectfully, why do you think it was a serial killer?
I think I have read--I could be mistaken--that killing that many people in several locations over a period of time makes him/her/them a serial killer by definition. Depending on the motivation it might turn out to be a spree killer or a hit man or something else, but I think these days the FBI considers them all to be kinds of serial killers.
I 've noticed"serial killer" is used on TV to describe a murderer when it doesn't apply. I 'm hooked on Destination America, and on "when Ghosts Attack" about a guy who accidentally killed a young girl and blinded his wife a serial killer and that was the only crime he had committed. He was trying to kill his wife and killed the girl because he made a mistake in the dark.
I 've noticed"serial killer" is used on TV to describe a murderer when it doesn't apply. I 'm hooked on Destination America, and on "when Ghosts Attack" about a guy who accidentally killed a young girl and blinded his wife a serial killer and that was the only crime he had committed. He was trying to kill his wife and killed the girl because he made a mistake in the dark.
Of course I was rattling off information that dawned on me from trying to get a perspective on one man perpetrator,
Cartel perpetrators, etc.anyone..The way I was inserting types of weapons was irregular to say the least, but there are
certain criteria that must be released for me to form much of a worthy speculation.What I want to know is: the order in
which the victims were selected..Of course the size and type of weapon would help...I think we can assume that all
weapons were of a cheap brand.(throw-a-ways) However,throw-a-ways might jam and the killer never viewed using
cheap weapons because of a desire to be professional..And I am leaning on the theory that the serial killer acted
alone and his motive was to rid the world of undesirables...don't blame me for rattling on.J.M.O. Again