- Joined
- Mar 4, 2017
- Messages
- 2,946
- Reaction score
- 24,970
Can anyone determine what she has in her hands? tiaAnyone know what Angela had in her hand when walking into court?
Pike County massacre: Angela Wagner pleads not guilty to all 22 counts

Can anyone determine what she has in her hands? tiaAnyone know what Angela had in her hand when walking into court?

Anyone know what Angela had in her hand when walking into court?
16What is the age of consent in Ohio?
Shes holding on to her belly chain cuff. Goes to chain from her ankle bracelets. Notice George Jr didn't have belly chain.Can anyone determine what she has in her hands? tia
Pike County massacre: Angela Wagner pleads not guilty to all 22 counts
View attachment 157718
I tweeted toBelly chain from her ankles.
Whoops I can see her glasses in pic. I thought it was her belly chain cuffs.Just a guess, but maybe ? She put on a pair during the hearing as she was reading the indictment.
Can anyone determine what she has in her hands? tia
Pike County massacre: Angela Wagner pleads not guilty to all 22 counts
View attachment 157718
My husband said it looked like her makeup case incase she started to cry smh
Mods plz delete if not allowed
What's up with his jeans? Are they designer jeans made to look that way or are they really torn?
I know a lot of young kids wear designer pants that are torn at various places when they buy them. SMH
16 according to google.What is the age of consent in Ohio?
Thanks. I won't speculate on who it could be. It would not be wiseCount 22 for Angela Wagner applies from Jan 1, 2016 to November 12, 2018. That's well before the murders and right up to the day they were all arrested. It includes all the W's and Rita Newcomb, John Doe and any other unidentified or unknown individuals, the latter being a "catch-all" description that allows them to include other participants they may later discover.
The pattern of corrupt activity includes: Aggravated Murder, Aggravated Burglary, Unlawful Possession of a Dangerous Ordnance, Tampering with Evidence and Obstructing Justice, plus everything in Counts 1 thru 21. The indictment uses the qualifier and/or for these activities, meaning some could be guilty of one or all of these.
IANAL, but John Doe could be (1) a person they haven't yet identified, but know was involved in planning and executing these offenses or (2) a confidential source who participated in some of the planning, etc. and helped LE by recording or relating what was said in some of their "planning meetings".
The indictments mention John Doe because he will probably be part of the trials in some way, either via witness testimony, affadavit, etc. If he's a real person and known to LE, it could be someone who cut a deal with prosecutors and whose identity they want to protect for now.
I'm probably wrong on this, but its the best I can come up with.
I thought I read she was clutching business cards from the attorneys that are representing her.Just a guess, but maybe eyeglasses? She put on a pair during the hearing as she was reading the indictment.
Women staying with abusive spouses/bfs is not unique to Appalachia. I do not think that CR1 nor DR, told HMR to stick with JW out of some patriarchal societal dreams. HMR had moved back home, she'd moved on from JW, twice over. There was a sense of loss and sadness in some of her posts, but, there was no fear in them, not that I sensed, at least.
https://www.thehotline.org/2013/06/10/50-obstacles-to-leaving-1-10/
I agreeThose trailers, how securely they've been kept for going on 3 years, and the chain of custody of all evidence have been concerning to me. I hope they dotted their i-s and crossed their t-s.
The people who bought on land contact knew what they were doing. We can’t expect her to give property away. Very common in the area to have lots of move in and move outs.According to the article, the Wagners used "land contracts" to extract monthly payments from tenants trying to purchase their land, so they had significant monthly income. That's just from their real estate business.
Sad that they duped people in pretending to "sell" them the same parcels of property over and over again at grossly inflated values. They're "predatory" lenders, loan sharks. It's wealth extraction from working class people.
Also an interesting quote from a tenant:
BBM