Rayemonde
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2014
- Messages
- 7,550
- Reaction score
- 657
Why would the sheriff make excuses for a non-family member having failed a polygraph?
Did he make excuses? I didn't see that.
Why would the sheriff make excuses for a non-family member having failed a polygraph?
Did he make excuses? I didn't see that.
http://raycomgroup.worldnow.com/sto...on-recovering-at-home-investigation-continues
Looks like LE are examining phones of non family members as well as family members, so they are obviously investigating non family members as well as family members. Coupled with their statement that there were no concerns raised by family members' polygraph results, I'm guessing it was a non family member who failed their polygraph.
The Sheriff says detectives have interviewed the grandparents and said that they have been very cooperative.
Polygraph experts from the FBI and the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation were on the scene administering tests to relatives and others.
http://www.wfmj.com/story/30176129/missing-trumbull-county-child-was-in-custody-of-great-grandmother
That might be a reason for a failed or inconclusive test but I believe those types of things are already worked out of the polygraph because of that type of guilt. Her comments are just so strange, IMO, and I can't understand why she would have said the things she said. Most of what she said doesn't even make sense as far as I'm concerned and that bothers me :-(
The sheriff sure sounds like he's making excuses in this article, IMO
http://www.wfmj.com/story/30235608/...as-investigation-into-disappearance-continues
Also, I came across another article that said polygraphs were given to the family. It didn't say anything about them having been given to non-family.
Oh yes, I see. You're right, it sounds like one polygraph was inconclusive and LE don't think it means much.
This is old but I missed it if it was posted. http://fox8.com/2015/10/12/one-week-after-vanishing-2-year-old-rainn-peterson-is-recovering-at-home/
Trumbull County Sheriff Tom Altiere said his detectives are still trying to figure out how the toddler got out of the house.
Something her great-grandmother would also like to find out.
"She couldn't open the door, she tried," Dora Mae said.
IF it's a fact Rainn couldn't open the door, then someone must have opened it for her. Maybe one of her brothers? But great-grandpa surely would have noticed the brother/s missing at the time, no? Do we assume since Rainn is said to have been unable to open the door then it must have been locked? Seems as such. So if it was locked, then no one could have opened it from the outside (unless they had a key). I wonder what the circumstances were when Rainn tried and failed to open the door? If a child of mine was attempting to open the door, even if they failed, that would be a clear indication (to ME) that it was time to add chain locks or another safety lock just in case.
IF it's a fact Rainn couldn't open the door, then someone must have opened it for her. Maybe one of her brothers? But great-grandpa surely would have noticed the brother/s missing at the time, no? Do we assume since Rainn is said to have been unable to open the door then it must have been locked? Seems as such. So if it was locked, then no one could have opened it from the outside (unless they had a key). I wonder what the circumstances were when Rainn tried and failed to open the door? If a child of mine was attempting to open the door, even if they failed, that would be a clear indication (to ME) that it was time to add chain locks or another safety lock just in case.
She didn't say Rainn couldn't unlock the door, she said she couldn't open the door.
As soon as my toddler started touching the door knobs in our house....we put safety things on them. Better safe than sorry. I didn't want him opening the door to outside, the door to the basement, the door to the laundry room, etc.
I watched the video in the article and the part where she said she couldn't open the door was edited out. Could be they just wanted to shorten it but what if Rainn tried to open the door after she came home from the hospital? If investigators suspect she might not have left on her own then they probably wanted to find out if she could open the door.
Either way, the sheriff said it was the only door unlocked and with three kids under five years old, IMO it should've been locked.
So, according to the sheriff (who would have gotten this information from Dora Mae and Richard), that was the only door unlocked. I agree that investigators might have conducted a test to see if Rainn could open that door. In any event, yes, it should have been locked. My little grandson just turned two and he can open every door in ANY house as long as they are not locked. He also has no problem turning the deadbolts, but his little fingers can't quite negotiate the little lock inside the doorknobs. Rainn appears to be able to hold her own and looks like a strong little girl. I can't help but wonder what kind of door this is that she (allegedly) couldn't open?
With a two year old, even if she didn't open the door while all of them were watching her, doesn't mean she didn't open it when no one was looking and run off.