OH - Spencer and Monique Tepe found shot to death at home 2 children unharmed, Columbus, 30 December 2025 *ex-husband arrested*

  • #4,201
Didn't matter if he lied or not. It sounds like they had him nailed with the video and car license plates, etc.
How do I do a spoiler alert or rumour alert … Ill go back and check for now I’ll say it this way:
he may have left something at home that was location traceable, while License plate readers captured Plates somewhere else and maybe they can prove he was driving the vehicle because he was in possession of it shortly before and after the crime, and that no one else had access to the car ( I’m sure they watched it.)
And his charges were upgraded after he was caught so maybe that (what I said above.) indicated planning to them ? Saying he was home with his devices when they can prove he wasnt.
 
Last edited:
  • #4,202
  • #4,203
And, imo, he knew it was possible the kids would see their parents. That he didn't kill them is something we're all grateful for, but he did not show them any kindness (understatement, of course). He knew the scene he left behind.

jmo
We have no idea what type of internal doors were in the home, but I would like to think the killer closed and locked a door to prevent the children from gaining access to their deceased parents. I can't come up with anything else that would explain away the BIL comments.
 
  • #4,204
How do I do a spoiler alert or rumour alert … Ill go back and check for now I’ll say it this way:
he may have left something at home that was location traceable, while License plate readers captured Plates somewhere else and maybe they can prove he was driving the vehicle because he was in possession of it before and after the crime.
Personally, it would not surprise me if there is video surveillance on various inter/intra-state plate readers and highway cams from Ohio to Chicago/Rockford.
 
  • #4,205
We have no idea what type of internal doors were in the home, but I would like to think the killer closed and locked a door to prevent the children from gaining access to their deceased parents. I can't come up with anything else that would explain away the BIL comments.
Maybe. I'd like to think he wouldn't murder two parents, but he did. I'm giving him no credit for doing anything to protect the kids, other than not murder them too.

jmopinion
 
  • #4,206
Maybe. I'd like to think he wouldn't murder two parents, but he did. I'm giving him no credit for doing anything to protect the kids, other than not murder them too.

jmopinion
Did he spare the kids b/c he thought if he ever did get caught Killing 2 parents is bad enough, but being a child killer would send him straight up the river with zero mercy. He probably did it for himself.
 
  • #4,207
As the case goes along I’ll be curious to see how quickly they were able to place the ex in the area. Just by being an ex husband he had to be suspect #1 from the jump.

Murders take place Tuesday December 30, POI alley video is released exactly a week later. I haven’t seen any confirmation that the person seen in the alley is MM. Is it possible they released this very grainy, impossible to identify person knowing it is NOT the ex just to keep him at bay (“Hell, that isn’t even me, they’ve got nothing”) and less of a threat to himself/others while they collect everything needed to make a warrant stick? If they’re tracking him by that point and just need to locate him, I would think they wouldn’t want an identifiable video of him out there.

By putting out that video, it gives the public an image to work with. Incentive to review their own surveillance footage, jar recollections of having seen him in the area, perhaps other dates and times.

Maybe they weren't going for who-is-this but have you seen this-guy? I'm guessing it was a successful campaign and brought in good tips -- perhaps from the a homeowner neighborhoods away where he'd parked his car.

It was never just about identifying the murderer, it's always about building a case for conviction.

JMO
 
  • #4,208
Well if you have your own practice (Rent, paying your own malpractice, employee salary) it’s a bit different. You can cut that in half with expenses of running a practice.

Working under a corporation that buys you out, you are just a salaried employee. They pay your malpractice which for GYN’s as an example can be close to in the hundred thousands. Sometimes making 200K as a salary is better than 300-400 on your own. My GYN sold his practice in 1998 bc his malpractice was up to 150K at the time.

Most new grads do not open their own practice for the reason you state. The accused did not. Nobody I know ever did. Most want to make some money first.

After years of making, $50,000 or $60,000 as a resident or fellow…you can go to a large corp or doc-owned practice and make $300,000, $400,00 or much more…and THEY pay for insurance, sometimes tail insurance, 401k…etc.

Why take on all those burdens like rent, employees, etc.

In the smaller practices you can get the big starting salary. goon a track to partner, often making WAY more in a few years. You become a part owner.

Or the corporations, where yes, you are an employee …but you are not having to pay malpractice etc. Some pay student loans as well as all the other perks.

But you must rigorously keep up in yr field, or like any business these days, they will no longer find you valuable. Especially in medicine, where lives are on the line. Physicians continually have to be recertified as well throughout their careers.

In any event, for our purposes, the accused is in a very lucrative field. We just don’t know if he has encountered professional difficulties.
 
  • #4,209
Yes I agree, given the killer was a surgeon, and most likely detail oriented, the location of the GSWs will tell the tale.

If the chest wounds were deliberate, you are saying he didn't want immediate death. Which fits my ideas about face to face interaction with killer and victim, it is done for specific reasons.
No, I think he wanted almost immediate death. I think it is possible the Tepe's could have been shot in the head in addition to the chest. Sorry, I didn't want to be so graphic, but this is what I've thought from the very beginning.

MOO
 
  • #4,210
How do I do a spoiler alert or rumour alert … Ill go back and check for now I’ll say it this way:
he may have left something at home that was location traceable, while License plate readers captured Plates somewhere else and maybe they can prove he was driving the vehicle because he was in possession of it shortly before and after the crime
And his charges were upgraded after he was caught so maybe that (what I said above.) indicated planning to them ? Saying he was home with his devices when they can prove he wasnt.
Good point. If the charges were upgraded after the arrest, it seems reasonable to think that something was found at the home which was incriminating evidence meriting additional charges.
 
  • #4,211
i'd have to go back and listen to it but I believe they stated the address from which the call was made.
They didn't. From this link:

"In April, Columbus police received a 911 hang-up call that came from the area of the Tepe home. When a dispatcher called the number back, the woman, who sounded as if she were crying, said she didn't need police help. She did not provide her name or location to the dispatcher. The call was listed as originating from the Tepe home.

Media outlets and social media users have speculated that the call came from Monique Tepe. Chief Elaine Bryant said that the caller was not Monique Tepe. Police have no history of calls from that address or related to the Tepes, Assistant Chief Greg Bodker said.

The Department of Public Safety said 911 calls in a more densely populated area with multiple cellphone towers can be pinpointed to a location within up to an approximately 30 meter radius."
 
  • #4,212
We have no idea what type of internal doors were in the home, but I would like to think the killer closed and locked a door to prevent the children from gaining access to their deceased parents. I can't come up with anything else that would explain away the BIL comments.
If the killer locks the kids in a room, it also puts them at increased risk. It may take LE longer to get to them if they have to break down the door. Also scaring the kids more. And if there is a fire, the children cannot run to an outside door. Also locking them in with a dog who may become agitated and aggressive, especially with no food and water, etc., is not good.

Any way we slice it, the killer put the children in harm's way. Short term and long term.
 
  • #4,213
Maybe. I'd like to think he wouldn't murder two parents, but he did. I'm giving him no credit for doing anything to protect the kids, other than not murder them too.

jmopinion
I wasn't crediting the killer with anything, but I do think its telling that the children were not harmed, and according to the BIL, were able to be removed from the home without seeing anything.
 
  • #4,214
No, I think he wanted almost immediate death. I think it is possible the Tepe's could have been shot in the head in addition to the chest. Sorry, I didn't want to be so graphic, but this is what I've thought from the very beginning.

MOO
As I say, autopsy will tell the tale. GSWs will tell us the killer's intent in terms of how he wanted them to die.
 
  • #4,215
Wondering if MT learned and repeated something about the ex, maybe concerning very off-putting( freaky, or even criminal behavior), that is not necessarily DV?, speculation, imo.
 
  • #4,216
Maybe an unexpected divorce,
I dont know exactly what his involvement in the malpractice suit was ( it said supervising a resident) But there were others involved also.
Did he sell his house for a small amount and a year later it sold for 75k more? For all we know a new owner could have done Reno’s and flipped it,
Maybe its perceived unfairness, over and over , but blames her, b/c he thought the divorce messed with his thinking?
 
Last edited:
  • #4,217
Wondering if MT learned and repeated something about the ex, maybe concerning very off-putting( freaky, or even criminal behavior), that is not necessarily DV?, speculation, imo.
My guess is that, years ago, she experienced something from him that represented a line crossed. Pure speculation, though.
 
  • #4,218
Almost every defendent pleas "not guilty" at first, even if they admit guilt later.

It's up to the prosecution to prove guilt and if they can't do that, the defendent won't be convicted at all. It's worth the gamble to most people to hope the prosecution fails and they can go free.

Of course, some defendants do eventually plea guilty, but almost never right away.

And, even if they do admit guilt, the prosecution STILL has to present the evidence and the judge cannot simply accept a guilty plea without proof it is true. This case has a ways to go.

jmopinion
When I was at a a low point and was arrested, I tried to plea "guilty" at my first appearance because I didn't want to go through the whole thing and, well, I was guilty.

The judge wouldn't let me plead guilty and entered a not guilty plea on my behalf. I think it's pretty standard for initial "not guilty" pleas, even if it's not what the defendant wants.
 
  • #4,219
My guess is that, years ago, she experienced something from him that represented a line crossed. Pure speculation, though.
Has to be b/c her buying the wedding rings kind of sounds to me, like she wanted to marry him at that time. Something changed.
 
  • #4,220
agree even shook hands with the attorney and seemed to thank her.
He has to keep the “not guilty” appearances up. Imo.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
68
Guests online
1,983
Total visitors
2,051

Forum statistics

Threads
638,876
Messages
18,734,205
Members
244,545
Latest member
mmmock97
Back
Top