So I’m going to jump on here. Have many of you listened to the 911 call from Dr Valrose? So many things threw me off in such a short statement:
"I'm on vacation, but this individual, Spencer, works with me, and he did not show up to work this morning. And we cannot get a hold of him or his family," Valrose told dispatchers, according to audio of a 911 call reviewed by ABC News. "He's been reliable, and we cannot get in touch with him, his wife, his family, anybody that lives in that house."
1) Why are you automatically alibiing yourself from the situation “I’m on vacation” (which I’m sure can be verified, still odd)
2) Although he corrects himself and says “Spencer” his initial instinct was to refer to him as an “individual” - which we know many murderers subconsciously do to remove the connection to the victim. This was someone who for all we know were very good friends / colleagues. Again, odd.
3) Although not related to the Dr, why did he say “we cannot get in touch with…anybody that lives in that house” - was this just an exaggeration of phrasing for urgency, or did they have guests / family staying there?
4) Lastly, some of us have listened to more 911 calls in our lives more than we care to admit, and I’d like to think I have a pretty good finger on when someone sounds genuinely *concerned* vs *appearing concerned* and something about his tone, his cadence, and his breathiness is sending up flags for me. Listen and let me know what you think. Obviously, I hope I’m wrong though…