- Joined
- May 9, 2009
- Messages
- 40,922
- Reaction score
- 126,028
Their background? Start with the fact that their families have apparently not pushed for this case to stay on LE and the media's front burner. Add the lawsuit and the protective order in re: Mr. Jamison and his father. Stir in both of the parents evidently being on disability, and the talk that Mrs. Jamison suffers from alarming depression. Add a full helping of the family evidently seeking to move with their young child and live an isolated life---they had gone to a fairly remote area to look at land.
Hinkiness permeates this case. While we animal lovers focus on the dog, it in fact may not have even come into their chain of caring. They may have had what, to them, were larger fears and concerns.
To me, some of those very same things are what point me in the direction of foul play. Bobby was no shrinking violet ... he had the moxy to stand up for what he believed he was entitled to by initiating the fraud lawsuit against his dad, and to obtain a PO, and launch another suit re the car accident.
The fact they were looking at property reasonably local tells me they were actually PLANNING their future together, and not in Timbuktu .. they simply PLANNED to relocate a distance from Weleetka, not fall off the face of the earth.