[/COLOR]
Missizzy- So am I to understand that it is the habit of this forum to convict a person without the benefit of knowing any of the facts in the case? WOW!!
Thank God our forefathers had the intelligence to put in place a system that does not allow a person to be persecuted based merely on gossip, rumor, or innuendo! I understand that you are predisposed to believe all people are guilty if they are charged, given that you and your family have been victims in the past. I get that. But is that right? It was not then when our system of justice was set up, and it is not now. Having said that, do I know that our system is less than perfect. Of course I do. We have all heard of guilty people set free on some technicality or other. We also have heard of innocent people convicted only to find out later that they actually did not do the crime. They system is not perfect, but it is certainly better than the alternative of trying people in the court of public opinion. That is trial by vigilante. And we all know that vigilanties get it wrong as often as they get it right.
You state, "I highly doubt it in this case, given the facts that have been presented". Again I ask, what facts? If you have an actual fact beyond rumor or conjecture, by all means, please share it. Here are the only facts that have been thus far presented: 1. Mr. Schacht has been accused. 2. Mr. Schacht has been arrested, charged, and arraigned. 3. Bail was sent and Mr. Schacht paid the bail and was released pending trial. I have scoured all media sources as well as all forums and everything else I coud find out on the web. I have yet to find any other actual fact other than the 3 I have listed. Again, if you know of another fact, please, I beg you to share it.
I would also remind you of this. There is a very famous case where in a person was accused. He was tried and convicted. He was sentenced to death. That sentence was carried out in the most hideous fashion. It was later discovered that this person was innocent. Indeed, this person was not only innocent of the crime, he was completely innocent of any offense period. His name was Jesus Christ. Now I am certainly not trying to say that Mr. Schacht is the second coming. I am merely pointing out that sometimes things are not what they seem to be. An accusation is not and never should be proof of guilt. And thank God for that.